This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 13 December 2017 by reviewer I dream of horses ( talk · contribs). Physics Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Jaynes-Cummings model page were merged into Jaynes–Cummings model. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (August 2018)

Im not sure about this, so i don't want to make any changes myself, but it seems strange that ν (nu), generally used as the symbol for frequency is being used to represent an angular frequency. Wouldn't ω₁ and ω₂ or something similar be better? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.216.54.172 ( talk) 20:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC) reply

I was also thinking about that. One should use different notations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farid2053 ( talk • contribs) 06:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply

ω is the standard character used in the literature. This article seems pretty mess too. If I get the time I'm inclined to rewrite this. -- 129.11.77.198 ( talk) 08:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC) reply

Okay, I have no idea how editing stuff works, but comapared to Cohen-Tannoudji there should be a minus in the arctan(). So someone might want to change: arctan(...) -> arctan(- ...)

134.60.83.75 ( talk) 16:34, 8 September 2014 (UTC) reply

It seems the Jaynes-Cummings model page is essentially a duplicate of this page, with a misspelling (“-” instead of “–”). The content is slightly different, but I am pretty certain the same model is being referred to on both pages. The title figure is even the same. There is some non-duplicate content, though, so that might be merged in somehow, and notation would probably have to be made consistent throughout. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MYT ( talk • contribs) 11 May 2018 (UTC)

• I merged the two articles. I also shifted the "Articles for creation" tag here because it was originally C-class. Not sure if its the right procedure but I think once this article is cleaned up it should be C-class too. AquaDTRS ( talk) 22:06, 7 August 2018 (UTC) reply