![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
JavaFX is intended to replace Swing as the standard GUI library for Java SE, but both will be included for the foreseeable future.
JavaFX is not included in the JDK anymore (it has been converted into a 3rd party project). This makes it rather unlikely to become a Swing replacement. 2.205.65.151 ( talk) 09:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
JavaFX has support for desktop computers and web browsers on Microsoft Windows, Linux, and macOS.
"…and web browsers…" Is this still true? I thought JavaFX needs the Java Plugin to run in a browser. The plugin has been discontinued in most browsers. Is there still away to run it in the browser? Or do we need to rewrite the intro? — MiguelMunoz ( talk) 15:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Optimizing Runtime with Deferred Binding
- At runtime, GWT uses a mechanism called deferred binding to load the correct permutation for the end user’s browser. Deferred binding serves just the code the user needs and no more. What are the benefits of deferred binding? Because each permutation is tailored to work around the bugs and idiosyncrasies of its intended web browser, using deferred binding is faster for the user. Your application download contains no unnecessary bytes. The application doesn’t need to sniff for browsers or provide multiple branches for each browser. Faster for you. GWT does the work of generating the correct JavaScript for each browser so that you don’t have to spend so much time dealing with differences between browsers.
"on any browser that could run Java EE" - browsers do not usually run Java EE nor are they asked to do that. What does that statement mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osman-pasha ( talk • contribs) 14:13, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
No mention of JavaFX 3D though it's mentioned in at least one other Wikipedia article (Java3D development was suspended so they could concentrate on 3D for JavaFX or something to that effect). Is it vaporware? or does it exist? 72.234.110.47 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:22, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
It is true. JavaFX 2 is the best replacement for Java 3D and Java 2D and Swing and Java Media Framework (JMF) , that is what meant by rich application platform. Some of these will be deprecated. But Swing and Java 2d can't be deprecated . اقرأ ( talk) 23:32, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
It is great that they want to make 3d easier and more powerful. JavaFX 3D is now good enough and runs on Java SE 6 (Windows only) and on Java SE 7 (all platforms). Some tutorials are available as: [1] and [2]. اقرأ ( talk) 01:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Done
"This article or section contains information about computer software currently in development."
<< i'm sure, javafx is being developed, but it's also released to the public already.
The world does not consist of America only, - spring may be early in the year or late in the year depending on where you live. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.73.125.183 ( talk) 06:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
JavaFX is NOT a scripting language:
“ | Even though it is called JavaFX Script, JavaFX is NOT a scripting language (in the dynamic sense). JavaFX code gets compiled to Java bytecode at design time. So, JavaFX is similar to Flex (except for the XML-UI part). Note that JavaFX started as a scripting language in Sun Labs, but quickly became a compiled language (probably for performance reasons). Sun keeps using the term “JavaFX Script” to distinguish the language from the JavaFX brand and to avoid using the word “language,” which would make it too obvious that JavaFX is another language all together. | ” |
For some reason when I visit this Wikipedia page in particular the style sheet is different from the rest of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.155.52 ( talk) 03:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
“Technical highlights”?? SERIOUSLY?? Reads like a advertisement, rather than a article! This desperately needs fixing! — 88.77.157.152 ( talk) 15:24, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
My two cents: It would read less like an advertisement for many people if there was a header on these tech pages for "Flaws/Issues" with helpful info on limitations and a reasonably detailed but concise note on any bugs and their fixes. By hiding the topic of "flaws" in these programs, it gives the impression that petty corporate advertisement pushing the "everything-is-perfect" myth trumps pragmatic concerns of the users the product was designed for! And who is Wikipedia for? Corporations or regular users? Nuff said. 50.72.177.136 ( talk) 21:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
I've just cut this from the lead:
It's quite valid, but not encyclopaedic, and belongs here rather than in the article. -- Perey ( talk) 05:16, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
The external link to OpenFx is dead.
Is the project already defunct? Compare this JavaFx live developer link:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javafx/overview/index.html
quote: " JavaFX 2.0.2 is now available for download (December 12, 2011) "
G. Robert Shiplett 14:26, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
I came upon this article as I was trying to work out why I had JavaFX on my computer as well as Java? After googling JavaFX and reading a couple of the Oracle articles (Highest rating in Google. I wonder why?), I thought try Wikipedia. Why did I bother! This article reads like the Oracle articles that I just read (OMG, idea! Was it written by an Oracle employee! Of course not, this is ..... ). This article is of no use at all except to promote Jave/Oracle and it is no clearer to me what JaveFX does. Silly me, I must be .... despite being a heavy computer user since before PCs.
I know this sounds drastic, however I think this article should be deleted!
Keelback ( talk) 14:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
I think this article should go a bit more in depth. I would like to see a section like "Architecture".
As a reader I would like to know:
I think that would be a real improvement of this article.
P.S.: I know there are two sections "2 Design highlights" and "3 JavaFX platform components", but they barely answer those questions.
While trying to answer my own questions I saw there oracle recently published some information, e.g. a roadmap for JavaFX. Maybe this contains new information relevant for this article. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javafx/overview/roadmap-1446331.html
There is an chapter in the official JavaFX documentation, which should answer some of the questions: http://docs.oracle.com/javafx/2/architecture/jfxpub-architecture.htm
At least the links of the references 15 and 16 are dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.226.185.203 ( talk) 13:57, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
-- 79.226.185.203 ( talk) 13:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Given that JavaFX Mobile is now obsolete, should it be merged into this article? I think so. Toddst1 ( talk) 17:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
JavaFX. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on JavaFX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on JavaFX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
I tried to edit a dead link for the following entry in the Bibliography section:
I was unable to do so because the new link I've found — https:// www. manning.com/books/javafx-in-action — is said to belong to a blacklisted domain name: manning.com
Isn't that curious?
Then I checked the Wikimedia Global blacklist, and, another surprise: it has no mention of manning.com
P.S. and right now I am having a hard time creating this new section because of the said domain name Kirisakow ( talk) 18:16, 1 September 2022 (UTC)