This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to
participate, please visit the
project page, where you can join the project, participate in
relevant discussions, and see
lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:20, July 12, 2024 (
JST,
Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Date stricken from Japanese service varies between the infobox and the prose.
"The ship was launched on 25 April 1945 and completed on 18 June.[6] The destroyer was assigned to the 11th Destroyer Squadron of the Combined Fleet that same day for working up. Hatsuume was damaged when she struck a naval mine near Maizuru six days later that killed four crewmen" - This implies that the mine incident was on 24 June, but Nevitt provides a date of 26 June.
Good catch.
Nevitt suggests that it was attacked by aircraft on July 30. Do any of the other sources mention this?
No, the whole thing is odd because Enoki also hit a mine on 26 June, so why would Hatsuume be there more than a month later, especially if her mine damage was still unrepaired.
References
The Dodson & Cant and Jentschure, Jung & Mickel references are flagging that they contain deprecated parameters. Not a big deal, but might as well clean it up since that parameter has been deprecated.
Image licensing looks correct (not a licensing expert), and spot checked all of the citations I could. Looks good, there's not much to say on this one, gonna place it on hold.
Hog FarmBacon17:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Thanks for looking this over. I'll be fixing those damn references from now until eternity!