This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Japanese battleship Mikasa article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Japanese battleship Mikasa has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Japanese battleship Mikasa is part of the Battleships of Japan series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Donutman? It looks like vandailsm to me so i reverted it. Anybody want to confirm/deny? - Copysan 23:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
"Mikasa has been designated as one of the "Three Great Historical Warships of the World", together with Victory in Portsmouth, UK, and Constitution in Boston, USA." <-- By whom? Unless some sort of authority is cited, this isn't very helpful. - LtNOWIS 17:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
could someone put an animation of how the guns work on the mikasa, as the current drwaing is very confusing —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themightyhawk ( talk • contribs) 17:01, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
The "50% stronger" statement is at odds with the article relating to Krupp armour, which states that testing showed 10.2" of Krupp armour had resistance to penetration equal to 12" of Harvey (presumably depending on shell construction) So Krupp armour is equal to a 15-20% greater thickness of Harvey - nowhere close to 50%! Article updated in accordance with this information.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Japanese battleship Mikasa. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Why is the page called "Japanese battleship Mikasa" and not just "Mikasa (battleship)" ? -- Beardo ( talk) 20:10, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Perhaps I have got this wrong but according to Navypedia this ship was constructed by Armstrong, Whitworth and not by Vickers
http://www.navypedia.org/ships/japan/jap bb mikasa.htm
I note one of the references #1 refers to Warships for Export: Armstrong Warships 1867–1927 203.59.188.248 ( talk) 11:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
OK thank you for the clarification
118.211.49.254 ( talk) 09:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Apologies I have done some further research and there seems to be some ambiguity I would appreciate further discussion
203.59.188.248 ( talk) 11:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Would someone please explain why Mikasa, in its current state, is not a Ship of Theseus? 24.136.33.86 ( talk) 11:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Could you please explain, what are "barbette hoods"? Is it a "roof" or "deck"? MadCAD ( talk) 22:52, 11 November 2023 (UTC)