This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Japan foot-and-mouth outbreak article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of 2010年日本における口蹄疫の流行 from ja.wikipedia. |
1.Re:Title "2010 Japan foot-and-mouth outbreak" Even though this whole disaster happened in Japan, we must consider the fact that the FMD outbreak in 2010 started in Miyazaki Pref. strangely at pin point and is still maintained within Miyazaki. Considering 15 people killed themselves from devastation, we must note this is not a natural disaster but human error. Also having "Japan" will have a posibilities of damaging the image of quality brand itself. The contents are strictly about Miyazaki Beef and it's FMD and its history therefore it must remain as is. Otherwise the change is considered intentional. Should not be treated casually. Request to put the title back to "Miyazaki" instead of "Japan" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.163.122 ( talk) 04:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
2.foot-and-mouth outbreak is inappropriate. It must be "Foot-And-Mouth Disease outbreak " —Preceding unsigned comment added by SaveJPN ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC) SaveJPN ( talk) 19:37, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
3. Point 1 above is in error and should be ignored. Until the outbreak in Miyazaki, Japan had disease free status for foot and mouth disease. Disease free status is maintained at the national level. Japan lost its disease free status, so the outbreak is a Japanese outbreak. People outside Japan, including myself, will search for foot and mouth disease in Japan, not foot and mouth disease in Miyazaki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.153.49 ( talk) 23:10, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
4."foot-and-mouth outbreak" is inappropriate. It needs "Disease" and also in some cases it is called as "Hoot-and-Mouth Disease". Please correct this ASAP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SaveJPN ( talk • contribs) 23:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi SaveJPN and Nakasendo, thanks for all your hard work translating. Now that the outbreak seems to be over, I would like to help organize the article and make the English better. I look forward to working with you who have put so much effort into translating this article. Thank you!
-- Joren ( talk) 08:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
One of the graphics, File:HowDPJtreatsFMD.jpg is missing. The description says "Left:9000 farms in Iwate Pref. were due to receive disinfection following week.Right:DPJ Mabuchi in his flyer claims Miyazaki Pref. for outbreak", but there is no image file. Do either of you know where the file is, or can you upload it? Thank you,
-- Joren ( talk) 05:51, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 45 external links on Japan foot-and-mouth outbreak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.jiji.com/jc/zc?k=201005%2F2010050100193{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://sankei.jp.msn.com/region/kyushu/miyazaki/100516/myz1005161554000-n1.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.jiji.com/jc/zc?k=201005%2F2010051700882{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://mytown.asahi.com/hokkaido/news.php?k_id=01000001005210004{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.jiji.com/jc/c?g=eco_30&k=2010052000940{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.jiji.com/jc/c?g=eco_30&k=2010052101055{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.jiji.com/jc/c?g=soc_30&k=2010052700521{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://373news.com/modules/pickup/index.php?storyid=24231{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.jiji.com/jc/c?g=soc_30&k=2010052900269When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:51, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
This article lacks organization. It reads as a very detailed timeline, collated from news reports. Its level of excessive, momentary detail is extreme. Apparently, its editors have yet to make the effort to read secondary and tertiary sources on the outbreak, which might be sources of insight into the dynamics of the event, enabling the article to be more concise and less wordy and meandering.
This is ostensibly an epidemiology article. Perhaps the aspect of the article I find most infuriating is the series of paragraphs near the beginning which describe a series of frozen bull sperm thefts and the admission to Japan of Korean agricultural trainees. I'm unclear as to the significance of these events in the causation of the outbreak. Why are they mentioned at the start of the article?
I hope another editor can make sense of this article, which apparently is a direct translation of the Japanese Wikipedia article. It would seem that the other Wikipedia has a different set of editorial standards than this one.-- Quisqualis ( talk) 22:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Article reads like a log of everything that happened during the period; indiscriminate, with no summing up. Is this a direct translation of an article on another Wikipedia? What is with the theft of bull sperm over a period of years? Was it in any way relevant to the outbreak? What about the Korean trainee? I definitely won't read this endless, boring, and useless article. Whatever lessons were learned, they are not being conveyed by this article.-- Quisqualis ( talk) 05:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC)