This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
I have reason to believe that James Dyer Ball was the son of
Dyer Ball, who moved to
Canton in Agust of 1845. In 1846 he remarried. Left Canton eight years later for England, then returned to Canton in 1857.
Is it accidental that James Dyer Ball was born in 1847, just the second year after Dyer Ball married. James Dyer Ball was born in Canton, exactly where Dyer Ball coupled lived.
Further, Dyer Ball adopted a Chinese name 波乃耶,which is not a phonetic transcription
of Dyer Ball(鲍尔)。If James Dyer Ball was not the son of Dyer Ball, he would have no
reason to adopt the same Chinese name 波乃耶。
Is there any good reason to list the books he wrote, and then add a reference to some of them? For instance why have
* ''How to Speak Cantonese: Fifty Conversations in Cantonese Colloquial, with the Chinese Character, Free and Literal English Translations, and [[Romanization|Romanised]] Spelling with Tonic and Diacritical Marks, etc.''<ref>{{cite book|title=How to Speak Cantonese: Fifty Conversations in Cantonese Colloquial, with the Chinese Character, Free and Literal English Translations, and Romanised Spelling with Tonic and Diacritical Marks, etc.|last=Ball|first=James Dyer|place=Hong Kong|publisher=Kelly & Walsh|date=1902}}</ref>
to create
How to Speak Cantonese: Fifty Conversations in Cantonese Colloquial, with the Chinese Character, Free and Literal English Translations, and
Romanised Spelling with Tonic and Diacritical Marks, etc.[1]
References
^Ball, James Dyer (1902). How to Speak Cantonese: Fifty Conversations in Cantonese Colloquial, with the Chinese Character, Free and Literal English Translations, and Romanised Spelling with Tonic and Diacritical Marks, etc. Hong Kong: Kelly & Walsh.
which merely duplicates the information? Might I suggest that adopting the citation style for all members of the list would halve the work required:
*{{cite book|title=How to Speak Cantonese: Fifty Conversations in Cantonese Colloquial, with the Chinese Character, Free and Literal English Translations, and Romanised Spelling with Tonic and Diacritical Marks, etc.|last=Ball|first=James Dyer|place=Hong Kong|publisher=Kelly & Walsh|date=1902}}
which creates the entry:
Ball, James Dyer (1902). How to Speak Cantonese: Fifty Conversations in Cantonese Colloquial, with the Chinese Character, Free and Literal English Translations, and Romanised Spelling with Tonic and Diacritical Marks, etc. Hong Kong: Kelly & Walsh.
Frankly, I don't like the way the page presents the publications but merely followed its form and wanted to provide fuller publication references. Just thought I'd improve the raw data and then worry about how it's presented later, if I ever get back to it. You are absolutely right.
Very hard to turn up information on Ball. There are documents in the Hong Kong Government archives on him and that's where I may have to go if I really want to contribute. His Cantonese Romanisation was excellent and markedly superior to most later attempts, so that needs to feature on his page, too. Work, work, work.
sirlanz10:47, 5 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Right then, time to be
WP:BOLD! since you are doing most of the work on this article I suggest that, unless anyone objects here, in a few day's time I'll blitz the list. That way the references will become as intended: references about him and the publications will be uniform. Do you agree?
Martin of Sheffield (
talk)
11:13, 5 April 2016 (UTC)reply