This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Should we have a list of JBlog sites? -- רח"ק | Talk 07:25, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
I merged J-Blogs into this article. BrevisLux 22:05, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Also, what about renaming this page "Jewish Blogosphere?" BrevisLux 22:31, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
It seems like a couple people are going back and forth on certain portions. May I ask why each feels it should or should not be included. SerandEz
Which parts are unverifiable? Perhaps we could remove those parts and rewrite the others better? Some parts seem tangentional; I'm not sure if those should or shouldn't be included, or if perhaps they belong in seperate subsections. --Ezzie 23:16, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
After some research I learned what it means to "make a fence for the Torah", which you perhaps might think I should already have known. Nevertheless, shouldn't the use of this phrase in the first paragraph be explained or at least linked on this page? "Making a fence" for a blog doesn't make much sense on the face of it. - Rpresser 21:56, 15 May 2006 (UTC) [signature added later, sorry]
From the article:
If this isn't referring to Pirke Avot 1:1, then it really really needs to be defined, because I don't understand it. - Rpresser 22:14, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Since a J-blog is a component of the J-Blogosphere, as per Wikipedia policy, it makes more sense to have "J-Blog" redirect here. BrevisLux 22:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
This page suffers from a lot of problem (including undue weight, lots of link spam, peacock, and few refs), but the biggest ones (in my mind at least) appears to be original research and violations of No true Scotsman. We need to find citations for these "facts" or remove them. Here is a small sample of things that seem questionable:
There is very little in this article this is actually usable in its current form, and we need to do some serious work on it. -- Bachrach44 ( talk) 18:15, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Would it be ok to move this to Jewish blogosphere? Jodi.a.schneider ( talk) 14:27, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on J-blogosphere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on J-blogosphere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)