This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I understand that other designs have not been ruled out, however, the picture of the fighter and the main discription of the fighter is contradictory. Maybe we should change the discription? -- Steven 21:37, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Sound to me its the Super-10. It looks alot like the MFI....
Chengdu is working on the Super-10. Shengyang is working on a different plane. This plane..
What about this? http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/2590/19bh1.jpg shouldn't it be used in the article if at all?-- Lan Di ( talk) 13:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Regarding the image http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/2590/19bh1.jpg, I've heard that it was a fake. More CGI images of that model can be found on the internet apparently. Thats what I've heard, at least. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.60.202.221 ( talk) 04:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Any input on how much technology etc of this plane is either the atypical Chinese reverse engineering job of Russian technology or whether sub-components are license built yet locally made, and or variant of Russian technology? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.161.141.148 ( talk) 16:40, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Given that the design hasn't even been finished, let alone a working prototype, does it even make since to list comparable aircraft? Chinese design intentions aside, the J-XX is still very much a paper airplane at this stage. 216.181.47.130 ( talk) 19:05, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hehe, J-14 is flying in the sky now, but the Western still regard it as a paper plane at the imagination stage. There must be one living in the imagination: either the Western or the J-14. It seems that nobody here can read the news report in Chinese in the Internet. ——Nussknacker胡桃夹子 ^.^tell me... 22:16, 3 August 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nutcracker ( talk • contribs)
The whole article for the J-XX is really speculation, the government hadn't formally said anything about it ( I doubt they will, like the J-10 they'll acknowledge it's existence once it's in service) so shouldn't we be able to add pieces to the article based on speculation? (Not from forums of course, but there should be a good few non forum sites about the J-XX I think, so shouldn't speculation from those sites be added to the article?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.50.156 ( talk) 02:18, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Rather than setting up the dates as being in conflict, why not show their agreement? The Chinese prototype will fly in 2017 with some hope for a limited capability in 2020, while the Americans agree with the first flight date but suggest that full development will take a decade. So even with the T-50 flying in 2010 and deployed in 2020, while the J-XX flies in 2017 and deploys in 2025, they will have been developed much more quickly than the F-22 and F-35. Hcobb ( talk) 20:31, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
I have semi-protected the article pending discussion regarding continual removal of cited content. Any disputed removal or otherwise really needs consensus. Thank you. MilborneOne ( talk) 09:14, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Lots of examples out there.
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90776/90786/6822507.html As to the classification of fighter generations, the world's military powers are varied. The U.S. defines F-15, F-16 fighters with the characteristics of transonic speed in medium-low altitude as third generation fighters and F-22, F-35 fighters with good performance in stealth, super sonic cruise and super maneuverability as fourth generation fighters.
I'm still not sure if this is a translation issue or missing a generation during the Cultural Rev. Hcobb ( talk) 05:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Do you mean the difference betw Russian and U.S. nomenclature about the aircraft generation? ——Nutcracker胡桃夹子 ^.^tell me... 22:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Shenyang J-8 due to political turmoils such as the Cultural Revolution, the J-8 was not produced until 1979 and entered service in 1980.
Hcobb ( talk) 05:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
China groups what the West and Russia as 3rd Generation as 2.5th Generation fighters. The rest of the world's 4th Gen then becomes China's 3rd Gen and 5th Gen becomes China's 4th Gen and so on so forth. Staygyro ( talk) 23:34, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Does it really have a Pelikan tail? According to this image, it seems to have a V-tail. -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
This newest picture is very interesting. The aircraft is so stealthy that it moves the direction the Sun shines down on it. Hcobb ( talk) 23:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Rumors and rumors. Can Janes be considered a reputable source when it repeats internet rumors? 12:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
9-Dec-2010 Russia, China push fifth-generation fighter programmes to meet year-end milestones
Reuben F Johnson JDW Correspondent - Kiev
A second prototype of the Sukhoi T-50 (PAK-FA) fifth-generation fighter aircraft will make its first flight by the end of this year, according to Russian defence industry spokespersons.
As with the first prototype, this aircraft will be flown initially from the Dzemgi aerodrome adjacent to the Komsomolsk-na-Amure Aviation Production Association. After initial-acceptance test flights, it will be transferred to the Gromov Flight Research Institute in Zhukovsky.
Sukhoi's general director, Mikhail Pogosian, stated that a T-50 will also be flown in a display at the MAKS International Aviation and Space Salon in August 2011.
A source close to the programme told Jane's that "the end-of-the-year deadline may not be met, but the aircraft will fly very soon - either before the end of 2010 or just after the [beginning of the] new year". Russian aircraft programmes - even in Soviet times - have often had year-end deadlines for first flights that came down to near photo finishes.
Meanwhile, rumours have emerged from China's Chengdu Aerospace Corporation (CAC) and the adjoining Aircraft Plant 132 that a Chinese-developed fifth-generation fighter prototype may also fly by the end of the year. Reportedly, two airframes - numbered 2001 and 2002 - have been assembled at the plant.
According to Russian industry sources, the programme - sometimes referred to as 'J-20' - is a joint design effort between CAC and the Shenyang Aircraft Corporation, with Chengdu taking the lead on the development. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.186.8.229 ( talk) 12:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
We need an article for the J-20 prototype which has been officially confirmed as doing taxi flights. http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3A27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3A39676d78-1d53-4723-a2f6-1461d18bc6b1&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest
First flight seems imminent. This is one of the most important landmarks events in aircraft development this year. /endcomment —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.23.90 ( talk) 20:25, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Bill Sweetman has given his thoughts speculating "lower supercruise performance and agility than an F-22, but with larger weapon bays and more fuel" and suggesting a lambda wing platform. http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3acaf36660-d425-4fbc-a284-008017b2b444&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/12/is-this-chinas-first-stealth-fighter/
http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/12/27/first-chinese-stealth-fighter-ready-for-takeoff/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.63.10 ( talk) 18:51, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
One thing about the photo's is that the plane is not flying this is a initial mock up of the plane it will take year's before this plane will fly and maybe a decade or so before it will be pressed in to service —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.21.214.42 ( talk) 19:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
We take BBS postings as refs these days?
Very well, remove the J-XX from the list of fighter aircraft then.
Why?
Because it has no room in the nose for a radar. Hence it is not a fighter aircraft. Hcobb ( talk) 21:30, 26 December 2010 (UTC) Was J-XX a program name like Advanced Tactical Fighter USA or an an actual plane's name. I thinks its the former so please do not delet until sure — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonstone ( talk • contribs) 19:08, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Does anybody have any reference for some sort of breakthrough that would allow for canards on low-RCS aircraft? Every reference I've seen shows how they can be used on meter-scale RCS 4.5th gen aircraft, but not down into the centimeter-scale RCS of stealth aircraft. Hcobb ( talk) 15:51, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
{{ edit semi-protected}}
77.103.45.44 ( talk) 15:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
There are pictures of the J-20/J-XX circulating on enthusiast forums, perhaps we can add these to the article?
Specifically post #603 http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?191146-J-XX-renamed-to-J-20-rumors-says-it-had-its-maiden-flight-on-December-5th./page41
And #597, 600 http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?191146-J-XX-renamed-to-J-20-rumors-says-it-had-its-maiden-flight-on-December-5th./page40 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.79.216 ( talk) 11:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Is this Chengdu J-20 the same aircraft - do we need two articles? MilborneOne ( talk) 20:09, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
How can the anhedral angle be different in front and rear photos? Hcobb ( talk) 22:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
I suspect that the wings are level with zero anhedral angle, but that the angles the plane was photographed from mislead me. Hcobb ( talk) 21:13, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
I have seen zero refs for this.
http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20101229/161986565.html
The word "flight" occurs zero times in the article text. Hcobb ( talk) 20:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
If Chengdu J-20 has really exist, how if we join J-XX to Chengdu J-20. Gsarwa ( talk) 01:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2011/09/imgages-shenyang-f-60-ucav-ste.html
Yay! Hcobb ( talk) 14:14, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20131002000137&cid=1101
So the PRC is putting USMC logos on their aircraft now? Hcobb ( talk) 18:25, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
South China Morning Post is not a credible source, as it is the equivalent of yellow journalism, except that the authors are Chinese. for example, the headlines today read "China to create new [religion]". Also, that section has nothing to do with the J-XX program. Dark Liberty ( talk) 21:13, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2723
Are we ready for another article? Hcobb ( talk) 18:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, it seems to be the J-18, not J-26.
Hcobb ( talk) 19:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on J-XX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on J-XX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:17, 16 April 2017 (UTC)