The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Thanks, I didn't expect the GA review to come any time soon, so I have some issues from the copy-edit that I need to fix up! Will do it now.
FunkMonk (
talk)
14:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Wondering why you're using mm instead of cm in article...
The skull was relatively short and broad compared to most other pterosaurs - looks odd as you've said it was elongated in the sentence before. Also "skull" appears in 3 consecutive sentences, though might be unavoidable...
Wow, thanks, that's pretty perfect! Wonder why I haven't found those. By the way, know any papers that list the animals in the Vectis Formation,
Lythronaxargestes? Haven't been able to find any, and Istiodactylus is also known from there...
FunkMonk (
talk)
18:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)reply
No luck. I assume it's not as well-studied as the Wealden and Wessex. The 2001 Martill & Naish IoW field guide may be helpful in this regard, but it's evidently quite difficult to access.
Lythronaxargestes (
talk)
19:19, 24 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Thanks, answered some things above (and fixed issues form copy-edit). If everything goes well, we'll have our first pterosaur FAC soon...
FunkMonk (
talk)
15:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.