This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This paragraph repeats information previously mentioned. Should it be removed completely?
Tigerboy1966 07:34, 6 November 2022 (UTC)reply
I've done a bit of restructuring and merged the sections on slaughter.
Iskandar323 (
talk) 08:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Benefits
The first line in this section mentions a statement (The halal way of slaughter has been considered to be healthier and more hygienic.[citation needed] ) which is stated as a fact. However there is no evidence provided for such nor is there any citation. As such I recommend that this sentence should be removed as it is more in line with opinion rather than any fact as no evidence of such is provided.
154.20.10.104 (
talk) 18:54, 2 May 2023 (UTC)reply
hunt
"Animals hunted by trained birds and animals"
Is it "Animals hunted by trained (birds and animals)", which could be rephrased as "Animals hunted by trained animals e.g. birds"
OR
Is it "Animals hunted by (trained birds) and animals", which could be rephrased as "Animals hunted by other animals e.g. trained birds"
36.93.37.154 (
talk) 04:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply