![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ok. do so then. Mtminardi 22:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Anybody know what naming system Irving used for their ships? Or if there's a list of their names? (The comapny website doesn't have 1 I could find.) Trekphiler 23:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of Low Importance, as I do not feel that many people outside of Canada would be familiar with the subject of this article. Cheers, CP 01:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
At an estimated 5 billion, a huge company owned by Canada's third richest family, I don't see how it's unimporant, the article is not even very long. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.153.241 ( talk) 05:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't see any real point of relevance in having a summary of incidents at the refinery and Canaport LNG terminal, mainly because there is no such section in the article for Ultramar and understandably, not Petro-Canada or ConocoPhillips. Would like to get feedback before editing or removal of section. Calvinhrn ( talk) 20:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
The Criticisms section is absurd. Most of the criticisms are simply out of ignorance for common business practices and their purposes. I'd say that about 20% of that section is actually worth keeping. I just overhauled the whole thing, but it's still filled with junk. I deleted the rampant POV sentences and original research. There were tons of personal statements, such as "citizens have had feelings of distrust towards Irving for years." It's all one man's (or woman's) rant, and Wikipedia is not the place for that. Also, I tried to mitigate the problem by adding sentences that provide proper perspective and show the flip-side of the issues being discussed. ask123 ( talk) 19:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
I do not think it is absurb at all. maybe some of you do not remember this, but once upon a time irving had a transport division within midland transport called greenline transport. greenline transport was around for a long time untill one day the truckers decided to unionize, and when that happened robert irving personally asked all the operators if they were planning to form a union, and then he shut it down, not because they were not making money, but because they were union busting. if you ever meet someone who worked for greenline ask them — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.118.177.31 ( talk) 16:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
In the section of the article on the Irving chain of convenience stores, there is no mention of the Riverdale lines of soda and potato chips that emerged in the 90's. Someone should write a piece on this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.100.63.68 ( talk) 21:36, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
-- John Bessa ( talk) 20:52, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Irving Oil. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I just reverted an edit which claimed, without providing a source, "In 2023 Irving oil is considering selling the business." I mistakenly noted this as "possible vandalism" given that further research indicates that this is, in fact, true; however, I made the revert as it was not sourced. If you add this info back please add a citation. WittyWidi ( talk) 05:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC)