This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please
join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
Untitled
Burlington was the stop-gap capital; Iowa City was designated as the official territorial capital in 1847. Further up it says the territory b/c a state in 1846...Hmmm.
jengod 22:38, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
76.102.31.185 (
talk) 06:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Following wording is very unclear and the dates don't jive with the first para of the article:
What was to become Illinois Territory was a portion of the larger Northwest Territory from 13 July 1787 until 4 July 1800, when the Indiana Territory was formed as Ohio prepared to become a state. On 3 February 1809, the 10th United States Congress passed legislation establishing Illinois Territory, after Congress received petitions from residents in the far western areas complaining of the difficulties of participating in territorial affairs.
There were fed-recognized Territories within fed-recognized Territories?
76.102.31.185 (
talk)
06:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure what is unclear. The text you quote above describes the formation of the Illinois Territory. This article is about the Iowa Territory. Iowa was never officially a part of the Illinois Territory.
older ≠
wiser11:50, 21 March 2008 (UTC)reply
What happened after Iowa statehood?
What happened after 1846? The map indicates that the territory lasted until 1849 but the history stops at Iowa becoming a state. No governor is listed after 1846. More details about the territory would also be beneficial, such population (including natives), economy, and major cities. --
Bruce Hall (
talk)
04:26, 27 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Territorial era of Minnesota lists
James Clarke (Iowa politician) as remaining the governor of Iowa Territory until 1849, but Clarke's page says that he stopped being governor in 1946. Iowa definitely became a state on December 28, 1846 and Minnesota didn't become a territory until March 3, 1849, but I don't know what happened in-between. I can imagine Perhaps the territory was simply
unorganized? I found
the act establishing Iowa's (and apparently Florida's) statehood, but it doesn't say anything about the remaining territory. --PhilosopherLet us reason together.08:21, 27 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Resolution! The Minnesota Secretary of State's office addresses this issue in a
preface to their republication of the act establishing the Territory of Minnesota. According to the Office, the remainder of the Iowa territory was unorganized from 1846-1849 and without territorial government. --PhilosopherLet us reason together.08:36, 27 August 2011 (UTC)reply
That's quite interesting. It appears that there is a gap from December 28, 1846, when the State of Iowa was admitted to the Union and March 3, 1849, when the Territory of Minnesota was officially organized. Technically, I think Iowa Territory ceased to exist as an organized territory when the state was admitted. This is how it is presented at
Territorial evolution of the United States, but it would be nice to have some better references.
older ≠
wiser20:20, 21 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Consistency in the title
The article title is "Iowa Territory" but the opening paragraph calls it the "Territory of Iowa." I do not think it is a small thing to make the terms self-consistent. Unless there is a Wikipedia standard on the issue, I believe both should be called the same as the name given in the congressional act which formed the territory. I will do this eventually myself, but I want to allow for editors to weigh in on it (or fix it if you know what is proper).
LaurentianShield (
talk)
16:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)reply