Interview with the Vampire was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 28, 2013). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
I removed a link that redirect to itself, about movie adaptation. Boris Crépeau 03:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
I added a cleanup template to this article, it's total trash at the moment. There is a section about how the book differs from the film (which is the only real content in this article) except it's disjointed, sophomoric and repetitive. It's comprised of several run-on sentences, and would only make sense if juxtaposed with a paragraph explaining the storyline of the film. I'll try to improve it when I have time. Moe Aboulkheir 23:33, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
I read once that:
Could a die-hard fan confirm? -- Tarquin 16:42 Sep 1, 2002 (PDT)
In the movie, does't the interview take place in San Francisco? - User:Olivier
Yes, it does. At the beginning of the movie you can see the camera sweeping over the Golden Gate Bridge and through the streets until it focuses on the outside of the building where the interview talkes place in. Also, at the end of the movie (altered quite drastically from the book-version), you can see Daniel driving over the Golden Gate Bridge in his hasty get-away.
after Cruise refused to shoot the originally scripted scenes where he was to seduce a young, muscular plantation worker in the man's bedroom, ultimately biting the man on his chest and then licking the blood that was to drip down the man's body. The scene was rewritten for Cruise so Lestat would instead be killing the young suitor of an old woman on the sprawling grounds of her plantation against a tree fully clothed...due to his insistances of script changes in order to suit his ego.
Wtf? Did someone just pull this out of their hairy arse? Wheres the proof? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.168.108.220 ( talk) 10:12, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Don't split the book and moive are to differnt entitys. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.100.226.27 ( talk • contribs) 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Shouldn't this be split into 2 articles
The two are substanitatly different. I'm not the biggest fan of either (eg, I don't want to have to do the work) but I feel such a split could make this section of wikipedia much more useful. -- Kode 21:59, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
What's the difference between the PAL and NTSC versions? It seems that the length of the movie is the only difference. Does anyone know more about this? Would be cool if it would've been featured more prominently in the article. EliasAlucard| Talk 12:07, 13 Sept, 2005 (UTC)
PAL and NTSC are encoded differently. PAL sources usually have a slightly lower frame rate, thus resulting in a slightly shorter running time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.76.60.162 ( talk) 00:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
There was mention that the movie failed to address the fact that making a child a vampire was not allowed. Looks like somone noticed this was incorrect and rather than removing the text they added an argument. I remember the line the person did mention so i removed their addition as well as the text that they were arguing against (since it is untrue). It may not have been emphasized as much in the movie, but it certainly was implied. -- Mr. Dude †@£К ║ Çøת†яĭβü†ĬŎИ 17:22, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
I personally am not fit to clean this article up, as it has been close to ten years since viewing the movie, but it is very terribly written as it stands. Please, someone, write this article up to be worthwhile.-- Lazarus Plus 20:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
This section is awful. Why on earth are we going into all these details about differences in the plots of the movie and the book when there's no basic plot description of either? It seems to me that, as people suggest earlier, the book and movie should be split up. Plot similarities/differences aside, this would allow the article on the book to focus on stuff having to do with the book (publication, relation to other books in the series, etc.), and the article on the movie to focus on stuff having to do with the movie (production details, cast, crew, and so forth). The article on the book should describe the plot of the book in a normal way, and the article on the movie should describe the plot, and note differences with the book. john k 19:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Two different articles should be created with in depth information on each in their respective articles. Book vs. Film can be condensed to the broadest terms and placed in the film's article.
Expanation of plot from the film contains numerious wrong details. The whole section revolving around Claudia needs to be cleaned up with correct information and the vague areas need to clarified.
There is an official Japanese manga of IWTV & lots of doujinshis. Also, there was a Japanese band called Malice Mizer who used lines from the IWTV movie in a song called Transylvania, not to mention the vocalist at that time; Gackt, has a music video where he went back & forth between being dressed like Louis & Lestat. Lastly, the anime NIGHTWALKER is believed heavily to be anywhere from overtly inspired to actually ripping-off IWTV due to overwhelming coincidences. I'm willing to provide images, sources, & information to anyone willing to compile & publish the information. -- LikaLaruku 06:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Here's a page on it by Bane Huntress; http://bane-huntress.com/Vampire/IwtV-Mainpage.html
I'm splitting the book and movie into separate articles as I did with The Queen of the Damned. Please bear with me while the move is in progress. The movie will be at Interview with the Vampire (film).-- Canley 13:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
The section about the film in this article conflicts with information in the article about the film re: Anne Rice's choice of actors for Lestat. 207.69.137.26 03:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
If I remember correctly, it is Lestat not Louis who uses the expression Savage Garden, and is first mentioned in The Vampire Lestat. So wouldn't it be inappropriate to mention it in this article? JanderVK ( talk) 13:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Casliber ( talk · contribs) 20:20, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Gotta run now but will see what I've got and ask around..... Casliber ( talk · contribs) 20:33, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Ok, where was I.....a bit of rejigging and reads better now. Forgot about this one. If possible, needs some more discussion on criticism/impact and the lead needs to be a bit larger, but reads ok and on target for GA. Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 20:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
3. Broad in coverage?:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
5. Reasonably stable?
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
Overall:
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Interview with the Vampire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
In chapter 36 of Varney the Vampire, we read Flora had made concerning her most singular and deeply interesting interview with the vampyre. Did Rice ever discuss whether her title was merely descriptive, or a lift from this classic work? Count Robert of Paris ( talk) 23:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
I added some citations in Adaptations underneath the comics subheading since there were none before. I mainly cited comics.org since it had the most information and was the most reliable source out of what I could find. Still not sure it is reliable enough to be cited, so if anyone finds a better site I'd encourage you to change it.
Also, finding a citation for the statement "A Japanese manga adaptation by Udou Shinohara was published in 1994 by Tokuma Shoten" proved very difficult to the point that I left it as a [citation needed]. The only sources I could find were sketchy anime sites and fan pages so, again, if you can find anything reliable that would be great. Here's some sites to start with, though I can't promise the info is correct:
https://www.mangaupdates.com/author/hlivodj/shinohara-udou
https://www.anime-planet.com/manga/yoake-no-vampire
https://myanimelist.net/manga/8570/Interview_with_the_Vampire
https://interviewwiththevampire.wordpress.com/adaptations/
https://www.tokuma.jp/ StarrySkye1205 ( talk) 05:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)