This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
state highways and other major
roads in the
United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The one down in the south part. If you take the exit from I-80 west to I-215, you can either merge with I-215 south or take that ramp, which leads towards Foothill Drive and Parleys Way. But there is a direct ramp from I-80 west to those roads. --
SPUI (
talk -
don't use sorted stub templates!)
09:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)reply
Hmm, I don't see what you're talking about. I'd have to go over there again (I live just a couple miles from there). As far as I know, you can't do that.
bob rulz23:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)reply
I noticed a couple of things that I thought I should mention.
The lead talks about I-415, but the main text does not. The History section is probably the place for a more complete explanation of I-415. The explanation in the lead makes it sound as if I-415 only existed on paper, but this needs to be made more clear. The phrase "deleted to maintain continuity" might be misunderstood to mean an actual removal of pavement, but I don't think that is what is meant.
This is true - I will take care of this
State Route 5 is mentioned in the History section but not in the lead. Perhaps it would be good to list it as yet another of the alternate names such as Belt Route in the first sentence. I'm not sure it's a more important name than Belt Route, and I'd be inclined not to put it in italics rather than bold letters.
Utah had a weird thing before 1977 where it had inventory numbers of interstates and U.S. routes (SR-1 was I-15, SR-4 was I-80, and so on), but they didn't sign the highways with the "inventory numbers", but with the regular number it was given by the government, if that makes any sense. But after 1977, they got rid of this so it belongs in the history section.
The last paragraph of the route description includes this sentence: "The freeway loses one lane in each direction and passes the airport to the west." It's not clear from that statement whether the highway is west of the airport or vice versa.
I'll try to tackle that
The cite web templates should have date, accessdate, and, if the file is a pdf, format parameters added to them and filled in when possible. It's not always possible to find a date of publication, but in many cases it appears next to the copyright line at the bottom of a web site's main page or somewhere else on the main page. I added an accessdate and date of publication to citation 7 as an example.
I'll attempt to take care of this - thanks for your copyediting help and suggestions, they're definitely helpful :) -
CL —
05:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)reply
The history section is a bit unclear, especially the second sentence. It may need to be reworded to make it clearer.
True. I'll attempt to get to that soon.
Meh, I just fixed that sentence that was the most outstanding. I read over it but found no other clarity problems because I'm familiar with the route; what else would need to be fixed in that section?
CL —
21:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)reply
In the route description section, are all the paragraphs referenced from Ref 3? If so, there should probably be a tag at the end of each of the paragraphs to make that clear. Also, Ref 7 might not be considered a reliable source.
Ref 3 problem is fixed. As for Ref 7, previous GAs have passed with this source. Perhaps this doesn't change anything, but it's for the record
I appreciate the review. Not everything has been addressed but I'll try to get to it tomorrow or perhaps Wednesday. Thanks again -
CL —
03:01, 2 September 2008 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Interstate 215 (Utah). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.