![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
References
The article has been tagged since January 2013 as "factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information". Large portions of the article have no citations. These issues together with the lack of any discussion on the talk page make it hard to know what information may be out-of-date. Does anyone know more about this? Does anyone have reliable sources to suggest? Should the out-of-date tag be kept or removed? -- Jeff Ogden (W163) ( talk) 23:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Internet in Poland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow editors, this article utilizes data from two authoritative governmental sources: Statistics Poland (GUS) and the European Commission (DESI). These sources provide insights into various digital metrics in Poland, including internet access, fixed broadband, mobile broadband, and e-government usage, yet there seem to be noticeable discrepancies between their reported figures. Given the GUS report offers limited English translation and my proficiency in Polish is non-existent, could someone fluent in both English and Polish review these sources and help reconcile or explain the differences in percentages? HerBauhaus ( talk) 09:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)