International Union of Biological Sciences is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject
talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 August 2020 and 25 November 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Abbsolutely04.
It turns out that this article was basically written by an IUBS employee in 2011 (See
Special:Diff/407641665), and has barely changed since. It's no wonder it reads like an advert for the organisation, what with puffery language such as "identify[ing] promising areas of biological science" etc., and the article having to tell us that it is "non-profit and does not pursue economic goals"??
Monster Iestyn (
talk)
06:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Monster Iestyn hmmm I would help but am no better as I am a member. In looking through it it is relatively accurate. I can probably point to some sources for someone else to try fix it but its better if I do not edit it myself. Cheers
Scott Thomson (Faendalimas) talk08:59, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Faendalimas: Yeah, accuracy is not really so much the issue, it just doesn't read like a neutral encyclopedic article. Unfortunately I just don't know how to rewrite it myself, or which of the sections in this article are actually needed (though at the least I don't think the "Objectives" section is needed, but I could be wrong). There are also no sources in this article at all currently, just external links to the websites for IUBS itself and some of its programmes, none of which are
independent of the subject therefore.
Monster Iestyn (
talk)
15:33, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply