From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gerald Waldo Luis ( talk · contribs) 04:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC) reply

I was like Whaaa... you can have two people nominate? Anyways, I'll be reviewing this article. Gerald WL 04:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 05:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Thanks x 2! Armadillo pteryx 05:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC) reply

References

These issues seem to be only visible to me, I could just fix it myself but taking it here first to see if y'all think it's needed.

Lead

Description

I'll have to spend some time for TV with my fam. I'll come back later with more stuff (as expected). Gerald WL 06:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Gerald Waldo Luis, Thanks for your many reviews of restaurant/bar GA nominations. I have a couple more in the queue and I hope you will consider reviewing Armadillopteryx's other nominations as well. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 15:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Another Believer, thanks, I love doing these stuffs. I will be semi-active until Friday ICT cause of stuff, but concluding this week is Decem-freaking-ber, so I'll be able to do more nominations... if I can. Gerald WL 02:57, 10 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Second check

History

Reception

Final thoughts

Armadillopteryx, I did a final edit, see if that's fine for you. Overall this has  Passed the GA criteria in my view. Waiting for your response, then I'll close this review page. Gerald WL 04:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Gerald Waldo Luis: Mm ... I'm not sure how necessary it is, since the History section begins with the story of the owners opening Barracuda. What do you think? Armadillo pteryx 05:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Armadillopteryx, Maybe the issue is we mention Barracuda in the Description section before readers get to the History section? --- Another Believer ( Talk) 05:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
I think, ideally, we'd have a passing mention of ownership before we compare Barracuda and Industry Bar, so that the Notes section is not required. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 05:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
That sounds ideal. Removing Bara mention in Description would be a good implementation. Gerald WL 05:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
I mean, I guess, sure—but it's worth noting that the mention in question is wikilinked. I'll go take a look at it. Armadillo pteryx 05:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Armadillopteryx, Your change works for me! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 05:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
( edit conflict) Cool, thanks! I basically just followed Gerald's suggestion to simply cut out that part of the quote; now Barracuda's first mention in the body doesn't come until the History section. Armadillo pteryx 05:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Armadillopteryx, seems to be fine now, Comrades. The green circle should be up soon after I'm having lunch as New York's in the dark. Gerald WL ( Pine wish!) 05:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC) reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.