Why not "Accompanying seven photos from 1994" fully formatted?
What do you mean? They accompany "National Historic Landmark Nomination: Indiana World War Memorial Plaza Historic District" and have the same author, publisher, etc.
Bodenhamer, David J. (1994). The Encyclopedia of Indianapolis. Indiana University Press. p. 762-763.
ISBN9780253312228. Retrieved 2008-12-29.-> pp. 762-763
I'd loved to review the content. But I'm afraid, My knowledge on American memorials is inadequate. Apart from
Lincoln memorial I've no knowledge of others. :( Writing seems fine. All the best with the review.--Chanaka L (
talk)02:44, 19 January 2010 (UTC)reply
I know what you mean. But as someone learning about this for the first time, is there anything unclear or missing that you might have a question about? By the way, you're supposed to mark that you're reviewing this article at
Wikipedia:Good article nominations. You can pass or put the article on hold or you can ask for a second opinion; that page has the directions if you haven't done it before. Thanks,
Reywas92Talk03:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)reply
My intention was to leave you some comments, not to initiate the actual review. I thought more experienced reviewer might come along and do that. Yeah, since I haven't done this before I thought it would be inappropriate to review this. That's why I left the comments on talk page rather than creating the review page. Hope nothing wrong with what I've done. Nevertheless, Cheers--Chanaka L (
talk)03:21, 19 January 2010 (UTC)reply
No you're fine. You're always welcome to leave GA comments. If you don't yet feel comfortable closing it, you can just add #: {{GAReview|status=2nd opinion}} ~~~~ to
WP:GAN.
Reywas92Talk03:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Very nice, well-written article. It covers the monument and its development accurately and completely. I think it's mostly there in terms of the
six good article criteria, and can be promoted pending some minor adjustments.
Two minor issues with citations that need to be cleared up. Please refer to the 'citation needed' tags I added to the article. These items appear to be critical facts that may be challenged or likely to be challenged, based on
WP:WIAGA.
The images are all tagged and captioned appropriately. It would be nice to add an image of the Veterans Memorial Plaza, but I don't think it's absolutely critical for GA.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
The article comes very close to meeting the six good article criteria and will be placed on hold until 3/1/2010 so that the issues raised may be addressed. Cheers!
WTF? (
talk)
03:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Veterans Memorial Plaza is actually the bottom half of the infobox image. I added a new ref for one of the tags and copied another for the rest. Thanks for the review!
Reywas92Talk22:30, 17 February 2010 (UTC)reply
D'oh! That was stupid! ;-) Anyway, thanks for clarifying the references. It looks like the article now meets all six GA criteria and can be passed! Nice work!
WTF? (
talk)
20:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)reply