![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives ( Index) |
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
![]() | The contents of the Local ownership import substituting page were merged into Import substitution industrialization. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (25 June 2017) |
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Wisconsin–Madison supported by WikiProject Sociology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
on 14:40, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
The study listed as a proof that inequality soared during ISI policies is in fact about the years 2000-10, so it has nothing to do with that claim. It should be removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walrus85 ( talk • contribs) 14:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
One section of the article seemed irrelevant to me. This paragraph describing "mercantilist economy" under the section "History" seemed somewhat distracting and not completely relevant to the topic of discussion, import substitution industrialization.
Not all of the citations have links to the said sources. Some citations are not valid, for example, citation #11 is only a URL instead of a property cited source. However, the few citations which did indeed have links to the articles/journals/books/etc did in fact work.
Jahnanbasaran ( talk) 02:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC) Jahnan Basaran
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Peer reviewers:
Jahnanbasaran.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 00:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article essentially gives the neo-liberal/ neo-classical view of the topic, not a NPOV. It lacks sufficient representation of the views of other schools of economics that argue for important substitution. For example, the assumption that "growth" should be a primary goal of industrial policy is a neo-classical assumption, not a universally accepted view in economics. Notably absent in this article are the environmental economics arguments, that import substitution reduces unnecessary use of energy where products can be made locally for local needs, and that because the majority of global trade is powered by fossil fuels, import substitution helps to reduce the carbon emissions that exacerbate climate change. -- Danylstrype ( talk) 05:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Which companies were never profitable??? 2A01:E34:EC12:36C0:F18D:D656:AA78:1B1B ( talk) 14:44, 5 February 2023 (UTC)