This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
I would have to vote "Nay". Because the disambig page
Quota lists so many other "quotas" and it seems like branching off articles per industry makes sense. --
Emana00:40, 16 December 2006 (UTC)reply
I have merged Import quota into
Quota share because a little section of each quota will be in teh article Quota share. The page may be moved to the name Quota after the related pages and stuff is cleaned up.
FirefoxRocks19:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Yor merge is reverted. It is inadmissible to merge totally different topics into a single article. Especially whet several people tell you don't. Next time don't do any drastic changes wthout waiting several says for many people express opinion. By the way, you never announced that you age going to merge
racial quota into the same barrel as well. I would strongly suggest you to edit things which you are familiar with. `'
mikkanarxi23:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Domestic economy loses areas G and H (quota rents)??
Domestic economy does not have to lose this area (quota rents) at all. It all depends on how they administer the quota.
If they auction the quota or give it to domestic importers, it stays in the country. Economy can lose that sector only if they give the quota rights away to foreigners.
WTO restricts the use of import quota since it is one of trade instruments that incline highest level of protectionism. Countries can only set import quota for special reasons, such as to protect national security, human and animals health,...
1betterworld (
talk)
15:59, 24 February 2011 (UTC)1betterworldreply
Automobile Quotas History Since 1981
The article and the talk page seem to be deficient in real world examples. In USA the Automobile industry should be the most visible topic in discussion of quotas, but is not mentioned in the article or elsewhere in talk. In 35 years of experience the foreign manufacturers chose to build and operate factories in USA with little increase in cost or price. The result is that autos, components and spare parts are some of the outstanding employers of factory workers in USA.