This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
I added some much needed citations yet there is plenty of statements I can't find citations for. Someone with more knowledge and resources will need to finish that section out. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
BrianFrench1995 (
talk •
contribs)
00:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Fair use rationale for Image:Speedbird logo.gif
Image:Speedbird logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
fair use but there is no
explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
fair use.
Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a
fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
The list has little potential of expansion and currently sits unreferenced with no substantial information. I propose a merge into a section of this article.
Airplaneman ✈04:14, 11 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Support, because it doesn't make sense that the list of an airline's fleet is in a seperate article from the article for the airline. This article isn't that long, and it wouldn't hurt to add some extra info to this article.
Compdude123 (
talk)
20:42, 4 November 2010 (UTC)reply
Oppose comments by nominator have been addressed, little potential of expansion - not true as it has been expanded, and currently sits unreferenced - now referenced, with no substantial information - information added. Still needs more work but has enough to stand alone in my opinion.
MilborneOne (
talk)
14:34, 18 December 2010 (UTC)reply
Oppose - the addition of the list to the airline article would unbalance the latter. List needs expansion particularly in relation to retirement dates. These should not be too hard to source.
Mjroots (
talk)
10:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Oppose - IMHO there's an evident increasing interest in operators' fleets, both by aircraft type and individual aircraft, in both current and historical groupings. Perhaps we just need thresholds for numbers of types, and numbers of individual aircraft, for candidacy for separate articles?
PeterWD (
talk)
11:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
I have just modified one external link on
Imperial Airways. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.