This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Immigration law be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The article right now is pretty stubby, and I think would be better done as a disambiguation page with forks to Immigration to the United States, Immigration to the United Kingdom (1922-present day), etc. Wl219 09:50, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
What's with the big section in the middle written in the first person? Is this an advertisement for CLESPA, or an article about immigration law in the United States? - 12.70.92.162 ( talk) 22:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
I think I found a second piece of advertising in this page. Under the External links, it seems like there's a group of links that simply link to a private immigration firm. I don't understand why those would be provided under the external links. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
50.202.151.130 (
talk)
14:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
The section on the UK is simply wrong - how do I know. run a uk immigration practice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.165.183.160 ( talk) 23:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
I have created a table comparing migration categories in different countres. There are many blank places there, unfrtunately I cannot fill them all. Please update the table if you know something on specific legislation. This table us going to be an important fource of initial information of those who is thinking about changing country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curious735 ( talk • contribs) 13:03, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Progress seems like a POV word to me. A better wording could be: There have been various additions and changes to the immigration laws in the United States.
There seems to lack a date on the Chinese Exclusion Act. "Many years later" is not very helpful. May 6, 1882 is the correct date, right? I am not an experienced Wikipedian and therefore I have not made the correction myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonwaever ( talk • contribs) 16:12, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
The sentence "Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Customs and Border Protection." must lack something as it makes no sense. Does anyone know what is meant to be said by this sentence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simonwaever ( talk • contribs) 16:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
This Article may need some major rework from a legal standpoint. I'll list some points where this Article could be improved upon (mostly as a reminder for myself, but comments are always welcome):
These are just some of the issues I think would greatly improve this Article. I'll try to get around to them as much as I can. --talk2Chun( talk) ( contributions) 15:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Immigration law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:22, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
I just removed that section and instead added Immigration to the United States to the See also section. This article is about immigration law in general, not in the US, and it should have a global scope. The inclusion of a section specific to the United States implies that the laws there are representative of many/most/all nations (they clearly are not) and/or that all other nations should have their own special sections too, which is both impractical and essentially impossible. Additionally, the information in "In the United States" was either irrelevant, outdated, incomplete, poorly written, opinionated, lacking quality citations, or some combination thereof. If someone would like to add relevant information specific to the United States and is able to express it in a neutral manner, please do so. DadOfBeanAndBug ( talk) 01:59, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Immigration law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:35, 17 January 2018 (UTC)