This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S.
historic sites listed on the
National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Immaculate Conception Catholic Church (Celina, Ohio) is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the
Catholic Church. For more information, visit the
project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
"Immaculate Conception Catholic Church is a parish of the Roman Catholic Church..." – It is not a parish (territorial unit or people in the parish), but a building and the parish church. I suggest changing it to "Immaculate Conception Catholic Church is a Roman Catholic parish church in..."
The article is primarily about the parish: see the next sentence, which reads "it owns a complex of buildings", not "it is one of a complex of buildings". If this were meant to be an article only about the church building, it would be inappropriate to include so much parish history and so much information about other buildings.
Nyttend (
talk)
12:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)reply
There has been some discussion on this at WikiProject Catholicism. Please
see this for the discussion. If this is about the parish, the arch/diocese should be mentioned in the lead. – SMasters (
talk)
14:33, 5 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Although not a requirement for GA, since changes will need to be made, it would be nice to comply with
MOS:NUM – spell out anything under ten, and use numerals for anything above that number. This is a nice "to have", but is not compulsory.
I never said it was wrong. I said that it does not comply with
MOS:NUM, and added that it's not compulsory for GA. However, if you ever take it to
WP:FA, be prepared to change all of these as it is a requirement there. I thought that since changes are being made, it might as well be done. Once again, it's up to you. – SMasters (
talk)
14:33, 5 March 2011 (UTC)reply
The layout of the picture in the Church section causes the word "generation" to be
orphaned on my screen. Make the picture smaller or reposition it higher (beside the "Church" heading), to avoid this. Same with the elementary school picture. It is causing the "High school" sub-head to indent. Make it smaller or move it to the right.
Umm, the church picture is already at the "Church" heading, and if I move any other images up to that heading, we get into sandwiching issues. Moreover, the text is fine on my screen, and if I make the change that you want, it will mess it up for someone else's screen.
Nyttend (
talk)
12:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)reply
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
All images check out and are properly captioned.
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
With the exception of the lead, the article is well written and referenced. Just a few minor things to be fixed before it can be passed. – SMasters (
talk)
09:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)reply
I have just modified one external link on
Immaculate Conception Catholic Church (Celina, Ohio). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.