This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bavaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bavaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BavariaWikipedia:WikiProject BavariaTemplate:WikiProject BavariaBavaria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I now see that there are three possible subjects. For this reason, I am now neutral. However, I have gone ahead and created
Ilz (disambiguation), which may need to be moved to the base title in the event that this move occurs.
Steel1943 (
talk)
14:54, 29 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Although "Ilz" is ambiguous, and I don't see a primary topic among the river, the Austrian town or the IATA code. I would suggest moving this title to Ilz river(are parentheses really necessary?), and then making this page, Ilz, a three-entry disambiguation page. – Paine EllsworthCLIMAX!09:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Definitely, the airport is not a competitor for primary topic. A town of 2500 people against a 65km river? Ooh. That's tough.
Google Books shows it as a no-brainer--about 60% of the links are irrelevant (misspellings, etc.) but a good 40% are about the river. None about the town that I could see. The German WP has a disambiguation page at
de:Ilz, including a link to
this that is impenetrable to me. (It also lists the airport and the Austrian town, of course, as well as an Israeli district, a second river and a boat?) All considered, it looks like the river is the most noteworthy thing historically. I'm sticking with it as
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Oppose.
Red Slash08:40, 30 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.