This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads This redirect is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles   Illinois Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The "Chicago – Kansas City Expressway" is Illinois Route 110. Unless Missouri starts signing something in their state, the two topics are the same. Imzadi  1979  → 06:55, 28 August 2010 (UTC) reply

• Support per nom. I almost proposed the merge myself when I first saw this article a couple days back. – T M F 15:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Based on the comments below, IL 110 should be merged into the CKCE article. – T M F 20:20, 18 November 2010 (UTC) reply
• Support - The two articles are related to each other. However, I think it may be better to merge IL 110 to Chicago-Kansas City Expressway, since that route is a component of the larger expressway. This would be similar to how Iowa Highway 27 is covered in Avenue of the Saints. Dough 48 72 03:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC) reply
• Oppose - albeit mildly; the reason I created it was because when I started writing the history, there were elements of that story that didn't really relate to this route. I.e. anything in Missouri. 71.239.22.197 ( talk) 13:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC) reply
• Support Merge, but merge IL 110 into the CKC Expwy article instead, per Dough. -- LJ  ↗ 02:33, 27 September 2010 (UTC) reply
• Strong Oppose I am currently on a trip from From Kansas City to Chicago. Along I-35 in Missouri the CKC signs are posted on some of the I-35 signs, so this is now a multiple-state effort and doesn't just cover IL-110. Therefore there is no point in merging into the IL-110 article because the scope of that article is the IL portion only. 166.137.143.92 ( talk) 17:25, 18 November 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Would you support the proposal if the merge targets were reversed, i.e. IL 110 was merged into the CKC? – T M F 20:20, 18 November 2010 (UTC) reply
    • Either way, I think we can agree that IL-110's article is a complete duplication of IL-specific content for the CKC. Whichever direction the merger is made, it should still be made. IL-110 is a designation overlaid on IL highways just to have a number for the CKC in IL. If MO does something similar at some point, I'd support redirecting the MO designation to the combined article. (Not I-35 in MO, but a MO-#.) Imzadi  1979  → 22:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC) reply