This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the
Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please
join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Hi fellow editors all articles for the TV series
I Can See Your Voice Thailand was brought up for discussion at
WT:TV mainly due to concerns regarding
original research and "user-compiled data" in the articles. Upon reviewing all four articles there are some serious concerns about these articles:
All four articles are heavily dependent on 2 primary sources that are press releases from 2016 from the broadcaster. As such all the articles fail English Wikipedia's
verifiability policy due to the lack of
reliable sources. Essentially this leaves all the season-specific information without any sources and are un-verifiable.
All articles were previously using
this article as a source for the format. This article is not acceptable as it cites Wikipedia as its only source therefor making it a non-reliable source. I'm in the process of removing this source from the articles and placing {{Citation needed}} in its place until reliable sources can be found.
The tables used in the season articles also fail the verifiability policy due to no sources about its content. If the tables are the primary place for the infomation then a "Ref(s)" column should be added as the last column or row where reliable sources can be cited. Please see
The X Factor (UK series 7)#Results summary as an example on how this is implemented.
The "SING-vestigators" tables in the season articles currently fail the guidelines on
accessibility this mainly is due to the color red being used in the tables and the names of the contestants appearing as bold red in the table. A solution to fix this would be to de-link all names without an article on English Wikipedia in those tables.
In the articles good singers and bad singers are written in blue and red respectively. This can cause
accessibility issues and they should be written in black as the prose section in most cases doesn't need font coloring to distinguish between the good and bad singers.
@
Horus and
Alucard 16: Hi guys, i've already reworked those articles in recent events and i'd fixed on infobox on
main page and its seasons
one,
two, and
three; and also added more references relied on its history of its show. I've already cleaned up all of articles. Sorry for your interruption.
Makoy Canlas (
talk)
08:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)reply
You can look up
The X Factor (British TV series) for the layout and ref I have in mind. This article seems to be just a collection of user written blog (it's wrong per
WP:NOR, btw) and a bunch of entertainment news throwing in just to make it less obvious that it does not have any substantial ref. --
Horus (
talk)
09:59, 16 May 2020 (UTC)reply