This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
|
|
This article is lacking information for a company with 30 years of history and sites in 120 countries. By revenues and square footage, IWG plc is the world leader of the serviced office sector. I would like to ask the help of the community to edit and add content to the page for completeness to increase its quality rating from a C-Class. Calling all researchers, writers and editors! Thanks. -- KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 12:59, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
The article, being the largest competitor to ultra notable wework is an interesting subject. Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 02:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
In the History section, would it make sense to include information about IWG selling its entire Taiwanese operation to the same entity to whom it sold its Japanese operation?
Explanation: IWG has sold its Taiwanese operation for £22.7m to TKP Corporation in August 2019.
References supporting change:
https://www.egi.co.uk/news/iwg-offloads-taiwan-business-for-22-7m/
Would it make sense to include the Board of Directors among the key people listed? -- KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 13:55, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi again! In the History section, would it make sense to add information about IWG selling its entire Swiss operation for £94m?
Explanation: IWG has sold its Swiss operation for £94m to a joint entity owned by private banking group J. Safra Group and real estate investor P. Peress Group in November 2019.
References supporting change:
https://www.cityam.com/wework-rival-iwg-sells-swiss-business-for-94m/ https://www.morningstar.co.uk/IntroPage.aspx?
In the Operations section, would it make sense to mention the comparison with WeWork?
Explanation: Following workspace providers WeWork's IPO submission and retraction, added to the controversy over their financial model, the global press has noted that IWG is both larger than WeWork and profitable. It is interesting that not everyone agrees with the comparisons being made. I have included sources comparing both comparing and critiquing the comparison.
References supporting change:
https://fortune.com/2019/10/09/iwg-coworking-company-wework-ipo/ https://www.geekwire.com/2019/amid-weworks-struggles-co-working-pioneer-rapidly-expanding-turning-profit/ https://www.fool.com/investing/2019/08/16/sorry-wework-isnt-at-all-like-iwg.aspx
KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 11:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
In the History section, would it make sense to mention some landmark openings?
Explanation:Regus opens its Signature brand in Rome.
References supporting change:
Explanation:Spaces opens a 20 000 m² coworking space in Paris, France.
References supporting change:
In the History section, would it make sense to add information about Regus (as it was known before becoming IWG) being sold in 2002 and then buying back its 58% stake in 2005?
Explanation: In 2002, Regus sold 58% stake to Alchemy Partners. In 2005, it bought back the 58% stake from the same private equity firm.
References supporting change: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2002/dec/21/2
As we have images of Spaces and No18, would it make sense to add an image of Regus at some point in the History section? Link below:
KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 15:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
@ KatherineBusby2019: I think we've gone about as far as we can for this section, but as for photos, I have a suggestion. I just picked these four Regus locations at random, two from iconic London business locations, [2] [3] one from Manhattan's WTC business district, [4] and one from some random location in New Mexico. [5] If you can upload any or all of those sets of photos to the Commons category, that will give readers a far more coherent idea of what the locations are really like than outside shots or a lobby instead of the office space and its decor. (But again, a comprehensive locations map would be even better.) In the mean time I added a "virtual tour" video from one of your landlords in Toronto, which is possibly even better to serve the purpose to show people what your locations look like in ways we can't really with text. EllenCT ( talk) 11:48, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=File:Regus_Brookfield_Place_New_York.jpg
/info/en/?search=File:Regus_Two_Park_Square_Center,_Albuquerque_USA.jpg
/info/en/?search=File:Regus_Berkeley_Square,_London.jpg
/info/en/?search=File:Regus_Canary_Wharf_London.jpg
In the History section, would it make sense to add a subsection on Sponsorships?
Explanation: IWG, or Regus as the group was formerly known, has supported and sponsored many notable cultural and sporting events over the years, including the 2000 Ryder Cup, the 2001 London Film Festival, 2017 Volvo Open Yacht Race.
References supporting change:
https://www.golfmagic.com/news/golf-news/ryder-cup-announce-six-partners/1361 https://mypr.co.za/volvo-ocean-race-regus-has-all-hands-on-deck-as-team-scallywag-makes-their-way-to-cape-town/ https://homemcr.org/event/regus-london-film-festival-on-tour/
Looking forward to feedback. KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 05:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
In the Operations section, would it make sense to add information and an image about Mark Dixon's interviews with CNBC and Bloomberg?
Explanation: Mark Dixon talks about how the flexible workspace model works, the growth of the coworking industry and Dixon's opinions on WeWork's valuation when IWG is much larger and more profitable.
References supporting change:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2019-10-01/wework-spotlight-has-helped-the-shared-workspace-industry-billionaire-mark-dixon-says-video https://www.cnbc.com/video/2019/10/01/iwg-ceo-on-wework-and-the-commerical-real-estate-market.html
@ KatherineBusby2019: are the locations in Switzerland and Japan no longer IWG, or franchises that should be on the map? EllenCT ( talk) 01:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Would it be possible to correct and clarify the following sentence:
@ KatherineBusby2019: please withdraw this nomination -- it's nowhere near the criteria yet. I understand the frustration with the COI backlog, but patience please.... EllenCT ( talk) 19:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
@ EllenCT: I've removed it based on your recommendation. -- KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 11:49, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
@ EllenCT: Hi again. I have noticed that your edits have ceased on the page. I would like to reinstate the nomination. -- KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 10:37, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
@ EllenCT: It's great to see that the page has gone from a C-Class to a B-Class. The page already feels more accurate and complete, thank you for all your work. It leaves me wondering - how could we get the page to the point that the Good Article Nomination would make sense? Is there a way to link this page with WikiProjects (I have tried to do this, but unsuccessfully so far). Do let me know what you would need, I am here to support you and the other editors find the best information for this page. -- KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 09:23, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
I know it seems like we're almost there, but hold off for a month or two, please. There is still a lot being written about WeWork right now, and much of it mentions IWG with some really interesting business stats and detail that I want to review after after there's a little more distance from the current event of the WeWork IPO cancellation fiasco. EllenCT ( talk) 01:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi, as a paid editor, I have now ceased to edit the page or make suggestions for improvements on the Talk page. Independent, reliable editors are now the only ones making changes (if any) to the page. Please can we consider removing the Maintentance template? Thanks. -- KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 10:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
In my opinion the tag remains. Even after a few non-affiliated editors have made minor changes, the content verges on promotional point of view. The criticism I expressed earlier is that there is far too much content on financial operations of the business and far too little on what the business does. David notMD ( talk) 12:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
I feel like I've cleaned up any potential COI issues so I removed the template and would be happy to address specifics if others disagree. I feel like some of the material Katherine suggested above and Jtbobwaysf's mention of the Wework competition at the RFC above should probably still be addressed (one of the sources I added at Katherine's suggestion does go into some detail about Google's choice of IWG over Wework -- and perhaps that's sufficient?) EllenCT ( talk) 05:05, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Given useful, referenced additions to the article, I concur with removal of the maintenance template. David notMD ( talk) 14:04, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
After much referenced content about the history of IWG and the name changes, this seems to be the sum total of description of what the business does (and the references are weak): "The company provides serviced offices, virtual offices, meeting rooms, and videoconferencing to clients on a contract basis... it is the world's largest provider of flexible workspace." Are there no sources that can be referenced providing more details about the nature of IWG's business. As a business person who has never availed myself of serviced offices, virtual offices, meeting rooms and videoconferencing on as contracted basis, I have no good idea if what all that means. David notMD ( talk) 21:12, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Done EllenCT ( talk) 01:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
@ KatherineBusby2019: is there any sort of a zoomable map covering all IWG properties? I suggest there should be. If I want to find space near me, the interface for doing so among all the six properties is organized by municipalities, which in my case means I end up looking at seven locations just for Regus (requiring me to click "load more" to see past the first six), none of which have specific locations associated with them unless I click through. That seems like a profound inefficiency given that people looking for serviced offices or coworking space are going to first and foremost be interested in a specific precise location. If the web site(s) get a zoomable, clickable map it would definitely make a good external link. In either case, this article could really use a static map of the ~3,300 worldwide IWG locations uploaded to Commons. EllenCT ( talk) 10:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Done fun! EllenCT ( talk) 01:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
@ KatherineBusby2019: Sorry those photos you uploaded at my request got deleted, but they have to be under a Creative Commons license because they don't fit the criteria for non-free use, and I was looking for interior shots because everyone knows what office buildings look like, and the one Spaces photo we have is a suitably gorgeous representative exterior. here's one that someone uploaded to FourSquare from your "(1)" office (the first Regus location?) at Avenue Louise 65 in Brussels which I think would work better for an example than the less common business lounge we have now. Can you get something like that uploaded with a CC-BY-SA license so we can use it in the article please? EllenCT ( talk) 01:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
-- KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 15:16, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Done perfect. EllenCT ( talk) 21:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
@ EllenCT: @ Dormskirk: Hi both, as editors who have made key contributions to this page, I would like to open a discussion about when and with what conditions would it be appropriate to build new Wikipedia pages on IWG's operating brands, Regus and Spaces. -- KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 14:16, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
[[Category:
to [[:Category:
. Remember you are building on
Regus and
Spaces, the later of which is a disambiguation page. That poses the question of what to call an article about a company (or brand in this case) whose name falls within trademark law but outside of WP:COMMONNAME etc. So please update
User:KatherineBusby2019/IWG plc (promo draft) with a wikitext refresh, and copy that same wikitext into
User:KatherineBusby2019/Regus (corporate draft),
User:KatherineBusby2019/SpacesWorks.com (corporate draft) (resumably having greater visibility for the domain name has greater profit potential than the ambiguous trademark), and
User:KatherineBusby2019/No88 (corporate draft).
EllenCT (
talk)
21:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
@ KatherineBusby2019: Here is a fun way to use a zoom-in on a small whiteboard to avoid title overlays for messaging. You could ask on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Architecture and Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Makes Video/Suggest for volunteers to do their local SpacesWorks.com office in that format like Wikipedia:Videos#Tour-type videos and the Colliers video. EllenCT ( talk) 13:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Would it make sense to add the following facts about the company? Events, their dates and sources all below:
Acquisitions
The Clubhouse acquisition of four London locations in Mayfair, Bank, St James’s and Holborn Circus (September, 2019) https://www.morganpryce.co.uk/knowledge-centre/exclusive-news-articles/iwg-in-talks-to-acquire-the-clubhouse-members-club-and-meeting-space/
Strategic Partnership Transaction in Taiwan for 14 flexible co-working centres (August, 2019) https://www.egi.co.uk/news/iwg-offloads-taiwan-business-for-22-7m/
Acquisition of New Zealand's BizDojo business centres with 14 locations in New Zealand across Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch (2017) https://allwork.space/2018/02/iwg-is-buying-up-coworking-spaces/
Acquisition of Basepoint Business Centres, 340 centres in the UK alone (2017) https://allwork.space/2017/08/regus-grows-portfolio-by-1-million-square-feet-in-a-single-day/
Acquired MWB Business Exchange, then the UK's second largest provider of office space with 50 centres (2012) https://www.propertyweek.com/news/iwg-puts-firm-behind-old-mwb-centres-into-administration/5104452.article
Takeover bid 2018
Prime Opportunities – approached IWG about takeover bid (May, 2018) https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/prime-opportunities-becomes-fourth-bidder-for-regus-owner-iwg-m6gnsrlnv and then drops pursuit https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iwg-m-a-prime-opportunities/prime-opportunities-drops-pursuit-of-britains-iwg-idUSKBN1KD0L4
TDR Capital and Starwood Capital – approached IWG (May, 2018) https://es.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUKKCN1J41KT
Terra Firma - approached IWG about takeover bid (June, 2018) https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iwg-m-a-terra-firma-cap-exclusive/exclusive-terra-firma-approaches-iwg-about-joining-bid-battle-for-offices-firm-sources-idUSKBN1JI2BY
IWG receives first takeover bid from Brookfield and Onex (December, 2017) https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-16/brookfield-onex-are-said-to-plan-3-7-billion-bid-for-iwg
Early years as "Regus"
Regus announces shifting its headquarters out of the UK to Luxembourg (August, 2008) https://www.questia.com/newspaper/1G1-184200580/regus-joins-the-rush-of-companies-to-quit-uk-on-the
Regus agrees to buy HQ Global, its US rival (2004) http://www.crenews.com/general_news/general/hq-global-workplaces-to-sell-for-302.5mln.html
Regus confirmed its exit from bankruptcy protection in the US and launched a GBP55m rights issue (November, 2003) http://europe-re.com/regus-exits-chapter-11-and-launches-55m-rights-issue/23854
Regus abandons HQ Global plans (June, 2001) https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/regus-abandons-talks-to-buy-rival-hq-global-9180658.html
Regus launches bid for US rival HQ Global (June, 2001) https://www.marketwatch.com/story/regus-to-bid-for-hq-global
KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 12:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi! Could we please reinstate the image of the first Regus centre in Brussels? This image was sourced from IWG's personal database and we give permission to use it on this Wikipedia page.-- KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 08:50, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
The goal is to more than double its IWG's presence here in the years to come. The expansion plans come at a time of rapid change in the shared-office industry, said Dixon, who founded what has become the world's largest shared-office company three decades ago, operating under brands like Regus, Spaces and No18 concepts.
"There's been more change in the last two years than I've seen at any time in the last 30 years," he said in a telephone interview with CoStar News, speaking from IWG's headquarters in Switzerland. "For the real estate industry, things like valuations, or the way people look at property, will also change. (IWG) have steadily grown every year for 30 years without interruption, more or less," said Dixon. "In the future of the digital world, with more companies wanting to be agile and buy products rather than buy something they have to put together themselves, it's just going to be a bigger thing."
The company's business has grown solidly in recent years in both underlying profitability from a store-to-store basis, as well as having grown by adding new locations, Dixon said. In the third quarter of 2019, IWG added 66 locations around the world, bringing its global footprint to 3,348 locations in more than 120 countries.
"We would expect to double our presence, but it's just a question of how long it takes to do that," Dixon said. "Our objective is to get into every town and every crossroads of a town. It's a McDonald's sort of execution. We are working to increase the speed of doing this through franchising. We are finding more and more franchise partners so that we can accelerate that growth."
In the United States, IWG's annual growth rate is between 10% and 15% per year.
About half of IWG's planned growth is tied to franchising locations to property owners, landlords or executives with other franchise business experience, Dixon said. The remaining half of IWG's planned growth is tied to opening company-managed locations in cities throughout the United States.
Like a hotel, such as Marriott, with multiple flags catering to different guests, Dixon said IWG has multiple brands with plans to add more to the mix in coming years.
"Its companies wanting to buy products and not buy real estate," (Dixon) added.
Newest additions
This fall, IWG has added some high-profile locations in the United States, including the following:
- Spaces has leased nine floors totaling more than 100,000 square feet at 287 Park Ave. S. in New York City, in space that opened in October.
- No18, a luxury brand, opened in August in Atlanta at The Shops Buckhead Atlanta for its first U.S. location. The 30,000 square-foot space it will be occupying is at 3035 Peachtree Road.
- Spaces leased two floors in Hell's Kitchen at 787 Eleventh Ave. in New York City by the Hudson River. The location opened in November.
- Spaces leased space in Miami's artsy Wynwood District at 218 NW 24th St. in Miami, near Miami Central Station. The new location opened in September.
- Spaces took nearly 25,000 square feet at 611 Gateway Blvd. in San Francisco, a place that will help cater to startups near Silicon Valley.
- Spaces leased four floors totaling 30,000 square feet at 845 15th St. in San Diego. The location opened in early September.
- Spaces leased more than 78,000 square feet spanning eight floors at 620 N. LaSalle St. in Chicago
- Spaces recently opened a location in two floors of an Uber-leased building at 2550 Pacific Ave. in a hip neighborhood adjacent to downtown Dallas. This is part of Uber's "HQ2," campus.
- Spaces opened a more than 60,000-square-foot location near Houston's Energy Corridor at 800 Town & Country Blvd. in September.
KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 12:29, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Since 2015, IWG in Canada has partnered with the Up With Women charity, helping recently homeless and at-risk women to exit poverty via coaching and support. More than $5 million in services has been invested in the community since the partnership’s launch. As part of the partnership, IWG provides the space required to run programme sessions. IWG has supported more than 370 recently homeless and at-risk women across Canada, providing meeting rooms at no charge for group learning and support sessions, and access to day offices for private sessions between coaches and clients. “The importance of a great workspace is so easily overlooked, but it is palpable to us. Our clients enter an IWG space, and the transformation begins to unfold immediately.” Lia Grimanis, CEO, Up With Women.
All franchised centres in Japan, together with clients and suppliers, have provided support for victims affected by the Kumamoto and Hokkaido earthquakes. Our colleagues, clients and suppliers collected books, unused business goods and furniture and provided these to a recycling company to raise funds. The funds raised were donated to a national non-profit organisation, Civic Force, which provides emergency services in the event of large-scale crises hitting Japan.
Our team in France partnered with the Global Heart Watch foundation (GHW) to educate and inform the public about the prevention and treatment of heart attacks. IWG organises two annual events and training sessions for our staff. IWG’s investment has helped with the training of 8,000 people.
Our team in Brazil has partnered with the ProA Institute, which helps low-income young people find their first job, preparing them for interviews through coaching and by providing them with smart clothing.
Our colleagues also have a partnership with iiGual, an organisation specialising in equality, inclusion and diversity in the workforce. “The purpose of this partnership is to create close-to-home environments in which people feel good and have everything they need to work.” Tiago Alves, IWG Country Manager Brazil.
All IWG centres in Vietnam, together with our clients, have partnered with the National Institute of Haematology and Blood Transfusion to take part in a blood donation drive and support 30 minor-patients (children under 12 years old).
Please let me know if any of these would make sense to be added to the page. KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 09:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Does anyone have an April 15-or-shortly-before event other than the Japanese partnership? It arguably had a sharper impact on the stock price than the WeWork IPO on August 14. EllenCT ( talk) 19:47, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
@ KatherineBusby2019: sorry I missed the question about snippets above. That's something your IT department may be able to address with HTML head meta tags.
Regarding the map, do you have someone in IT who can export a geocoded list of just the customer-facing sites, to for example, iwgplc.com/locations-data ? EllenCT ( talk) 16:08, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
@ EllenCT: Let me follow up with you about this. -- KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 14:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
@ EllenCT: Hope you are well during these trying times. Stay safe! -- KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 16:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
@ EllenCT: Change: Would it make sense to mention the coronavirus in this article, how it has impacted the coworking industry as a whole, and how IWG has reconfigured the company to adapt to the new situation?
Explanation: In March 2020, reports surfaced that landlord Dixon sent a letter to his own landlords in the U.K., seeking a three-month rent freeze in exchange for a three-month lease extension. A few days later, he announced he’s cancelling his next dividend payment and halting share buybacks as part of an effort to “reduce operational costs, limit both growth and maintenance capital expenditure and optimize cash flows.
Reference to support change: https://www.forbes.com/sites/chasewithorn/2020/04/10/the-anti-wework-how-mark-dixon-built-his-coworking-company-to-survive-coronavirus/#3818e30621b8 -- KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 07:42, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
@ EllenCT: Additional paragraph: IWG plc does a number of CSR and pro bono activities which are documented in their Annual Report. Would it make sense to include a new paragraph on this?
Explanation: There are four key areas of focus for IWG's Corporate Social Responsibility work: providing humanitarian support following a disaster; helping with education and skills development, for disadvantaged people as well as school-age children; supporting entrepreneurship; and helping with health in the community. Right across the world, this work sees our own colleagues, clients, suppliers and other stakeholders work with amazing energy and enthusiasm to address issues within local communities. In 2019, this collectively raised £412,420 through 354 projects, supporting 283 charities, in 50 countries. Our research shows that a flexible workspace serving a community can save locally based employees a total of 7,416 hours each year by reducing commuting times, directly contributing to happier workers and families. On the economic front, each centre can create 218 new jobs, of which 121 would be based in the local community. A centre can also generate US$16.47m each year, of which US$9.62m would be retained by the local economy. Environmentally, the reduced commuting that is enabled by an outer-city centre can save 118 metric tonnes of CO₂ per centre each year. Given our expansion plans fuelled by our franchising model, these positive impacts will continue to multiply over the next 10 years.
Reference to support change: http://investors.iwgplc.com/~/media/Files/I/IWG-IR/reports-and-presentations/2020/consolidated-report-and-accounts-2019.pdf -- KatherineBusby2019 ( talk) 09:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=IWG_plc&diff=969147052&oldid=969115332
I intend to revert that after I get a source for the 2Q-H20 numbers. EllenCT ( talk) 16:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
I intend to revert [11] per WP:EL. Any objections? EllenCT ( talk) 01:13, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
@ JzG: given your characterization of the quantitative values in the opening paragraph as SEO, I'd like to know which of the two 2020 proposals from Kate Busby above you object to, if any, and on what grounds, and if you have time, which items in Draft:Regus workshop you believe should and should not be merged into the history section here. EllenCT ( talk) 17:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
I note that "carbon" occurs sixteen times in [12], and ask whether others agree or disagree that the company's implicit price of carbon is noteworthy. EllenCT ( talk) 17:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I would like to propose that intro to page:
"IWG plc, formerly Regus, is a multinational corporation that provides serviced offices to clients on a contract basis. Founded in Brussels, Belgium, in 1989, the business is incorporated in Saint Helier, Jersey. It is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index."
is changed to
"IWG plc is a multinational corporation that provides serviced offices to clients on a contract basis. It was created in 2016 under a scheme of arrangement to become the holding company for the firm Regus and various former Regus subsidiaries. It is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index."
In addition, date of foundation in infobox should be 2016 and perhaps text under 'History' could be moved to a separate section about Regus - my suggestion would be something like User:Ehjefferson/sandbox
Ehjefferson ( talk) 10:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Ehjefferson ( talk) 10:32, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Ehjefferson ( talk) 10:46, 27 Jul 2021 (UTC)