This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
IP3 International article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@ Tedder: thanks for your additions to the article! Please could you add citations so that readers can verify the claims you inserted about IP3's notable personnel? It strikes me that there may be a WP:BLP concern here, otherwise.
Thanks! Zazpot ( talk) 09:42, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
The controversy may be notable; it is doubtful the company is. Please rewrite this or this may be deleted due to failing WP:NORG. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:39, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
This article has a very high ratio of references to text. That is a good for WP:VERIFIABILITY, but makes the article somewhat hard to edit. In my view, it will become easier to edit, while losing none of the WP:VERIFIABILITY benefits, if it is migrated to list-defined referencing. I propose to do that, unless anybody either beats me to it, or raises objections that are substantive enough to indicate a lack of consensus, within a reasonable period of time. Zazpot ( talk) 21:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)