![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
A large portion of this article has been plagarised from Bharat-Rakshak's page on the Kiev class carrier. L1CENSET0K1LL 03:25, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Is it sure the refitting work is being done in Severomorsk. Have a look at 64 32'52.13 N 39 48'50.19 E in Google Earth. This is Severodvinsk, Arkhangelskaya Oblast' —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.220.85.226 ( talk) 12:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC).
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I think it means "One who has conquered the Sun" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.56.194.22 ( talk) 22:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Russia just makes India navy looks foolish. This ship is 30 years old and the price is increasing every month. India navy is sucked by a deep hole.
It'll be delivered alright, but with only 15 MiG-29s, all of which will be operating at less than full weapon and fuel capacity, and a deck system that means planes can't land and take off at the same time, it remains to be seen just how effective it'll be. Add to that that untested systems, high cost and a questionable hull, and the usefullness of said carrier is up in the air.
It's nice to see the West isn't the only one that suffers from procurement dramas. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover ( talk) 15:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Guys we need to focus. Yes it's frustrating that India may not get the ship delivered on time, but any articles that are written about it and are used to cite stuff here NEED TO BE RELIABLE SOURCES. Much of Indian news has the same problem at times like British news: they tend to be overexaggerated in some things without proper credible information. -- TrevelyanL85A2 ( talk) 09:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
So this picture seems to be a model for me. What do you think? ( http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikpedia/en/thumb/6/66/INS_Virkamaditya_artist_conception.jpg/800px-INS_Virkamaditya_artist_conception.jpg)
And what bothers me is that the description says "The Vikramaditya operating as a STOBAR carrier"
(10/13/2012) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tong2011 ( talk • contribs) 21:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Is the namesake of the ship 1st century BC emperor of Ujjain Vikramāditya, or the Gupta emperor Chandragupta Vikramaditya? Any references to support either? Anir1uph | talk | contrib 20:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Vikramditya will be delivered by Nov 15 pending all trail completes by Oct 15, will try to get source soon Adaptor40 ( talk) 20:59, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
The INS Vikramditya was launched on 4 December 2008 and it was officially commissioned in the Indian Navy on 16 November 2013. So does the image in the article about the artist's impression of the ship (in the Design section) hold any significance? If it does not, then shouldn't it be considered for removal? -- War&passion ( talk) 07:28, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. The relevant guideline is NCSHIP and, despite the proposer's assertion, it has been shown by BDD and BilCat to be against this type of move. So despite the numerical majority, the consensus is for the article to remain where it is. Jenks24 ( talk) 11:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
INS Vikramaditya →
INS Vikramaditya (R33) – It is the most common practice to name ships along with their pennant numbers whenever available. I don't understand why this article was specifically moved back to this name when the pennant was clearly available. There are only 2 ways; either remove pennant numbers from all the other ship articles (there are thousands) or add pennant to this article name. I feel the second one is quite easy. And yesm
WP:NCSHIP clearly says to add the pennant number if available. Cheers,
ƬheStrike
Σagle
sorties
08:47, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
INS Vikramaditya. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on INS Vikramaditya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.aviapedia.com:8080/carriers/Gorshkov-smotr.wmv{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://picasaweb.google.com/117990383296131038585/Vikramaditia_feb{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://picasaweb.google.com/117990383296131038585/Vikramaditia_mayWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on INS Vikramaditya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)