This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dua Lipa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Dua Lipa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Dua LipaWikipedia:WikiProject Dua LipaTemplate:WikiProject Dua LipaDua Lipa articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
IDGAF (Dua Lipa song) is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the
welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our
open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose - song isn't primary for this, the abbreviation is. I am sure most visitors come looking for what it stands for, which is covered on the disambig page. --
Netoholic@06:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Support - the argument brought by the opposed makes it sound like Wikipedia is the Urban Dictionary, but it's not. ׺°”˜`”°º×ηυηzια׺°”˜`”°º×18:11, 14 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose, "IDGAF" may be a genuine term that others might want to search up and it does not make sense to immediately link them ot an article they might have no interest on. After all, it's a colloquial acronym.
Nahnah4 (
talk |
contribs |
guestbook)
14:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 1 December 2018
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Very interesting. That RfC was based on three examples, two of which were subsequently moved. But
the third was not (and I now see that the RM in question was also proposed by yourself). If this RM is also rejected, that RfC does need to be revisited, as its conclusions may have been far too sweeping. Were there any changes to WP:AT as a result of this RfC on its talk page?
Andrewa (
talk)
18:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)reply
Oppose. No
WP:PTOPIC. Creating one will (a) annoy and/or confuse readers who were looking for something else, and (b) guarantee that bad links to the PTOPIC will accumulate, degrading the encyclopaedia.
Narky Blert (
talk)
10:49, 11 December 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Requested move 3 January 2021
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
– I know this has been discussed a lot in the past, but it doesn't really make sense for this to be specified when there are no other articles for other songs titled "IDGAF". The article for the
2Pac is titled "
I Don't Give a Fuck" so this clearly doesn't violate. Also, I think this probably now qualifies for
WP:PTOPIC as this song is the only single release with an article and it has charted far more and has far more notability than the 2Pac song. If this doesn't work out, I think it might be wise to move to
IDGAF (song) otherwise.
LOVI3301:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Very strong oppose - as the dab page says IDGAF is an
acronym for "I don't give a fuck". It may refer to:
Strong oppose – this song is definitely not the
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The title of this song is literally based on the acronym itself, which has far more long-term significance than a pop song that will be forgotten in two years. However, I do not oppose a move to
IDGAF (song), as this is the only song titled "IDGAF" with an article on Wikipedia, but disambiguationists won't support this either.
Hayman30 (
talk)
09:31, 4 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Requested move 14 January 2021
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
IDGAF (Dua Lipa song) → IDGAF (song) – I think I pretty much got a consensus for this with my last move, but there really isn't a need to specify whose song this is when there isn't another song with an article and the same title of "IDGAF". The only close one is the
2Pac song, but that one spells out the acronym so I really cannot think of a reason why this shouldn't be titled
IDGAF (song).
LOVI3315:01, 14 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Another Move Request
All of the page move requests above are now superseded by the fact that more songs titled simply "IDGAF" have been released since early 2021 and some have their own WP articles, as can be seen in the rapidly-expanding list at the
IDGAF disambiguation page. Per a request at
Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests, this article is going back to
IDGAF (Dua Lipa song). I don't think this will be too controversial, if everyone considers how the situation has changed in the past 2.5 years. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 00:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)reply