The lead is a bit abrupt for an article of this length and detail. It should be expanded to better summarize the article. As a rule, each section should be mentioned in some way.
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
File:IB Diploma Programme hexagon.svg may be a problem. If it is a derivative of a copyrighted work, it is not free. How closely does this reproduction resemble the original?
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
More images are always nice, but in this case probably too much to ask for.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
A nicely written and well-researched article. With some expansion of the lead and resolution of the one image issue cited, this will easily meet the GA criteria. I will put the nomination on hold while these issues are addressed. Clearly meets the GA criteria. Well done!
Thanks for the review. I actually thought I'd deleted it from WP:GAN, and haven't done any work on it. This is the product of a number of editors; is it possible to add co-noms?
Ah, I see. I saw it on the backlog and it seemed a shame to let such a nice article just sit there and fester. I am sure it is possible to add co-nominators. I think a note here might be sufficient. --
Nasty Housecat (
talk)
22:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)reply