A fact from Iñaki de Juana Chaos appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 February 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basque, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Basque Country,
Basque people,
Basque language, history and culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasqueWikipedia:WikiProject BasqueTemplate:WikiProject BasqueBasque articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Due to the sensitive nature of the article since the subject is still living, we must be very careful with
WP:BLP. Please do not add unsourced information to the article. Find references from the Internet (I suggest looking at references at the es.wiki article on
Iñaki de Juana Chaos) and appropriately add them here. Thanks, Nishkid6401:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)reply
I agree, I removed reference to the December ETA attack
here as there was no reference linking the ETA attack to the imprisonment of Iñaki de Juana Chaos. If ETA have stated or if commentators have suggested the strike was in retalition for holding Iñaki de Juana Chaos then we should mention this with references. If not, it's completely irrelevant
Nil Einne12:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Considering further, I remove the reference to the protests. This was also unreferenced and I question it's accuracy. Iñaki de Juana Chaos has been in prison for a long time, and is being force feed. I don't see why the Spanish government would negotiate with him. Perhaps they had promised to release him or something as part of their negotiations with ETA, I don't know. But we need a reference if we are going to claim the protests had anything to do with Iñaki de Juana Chaos and weren't just about ETA
Nil Einne12:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)reply
If somebody could find any problem with the list of people murdered by de Juana, please refer it to mediation. If not, please leave it as it is and do not erase it.
"Mass murder (massacre) is the act of murdering a large number of people, typically at the same time, or over a relatively short period of time. Mass murder may be committed by individuals or organizations". I do not understand why the adjetive of mass murdered is redundant, nor the interest in erasing the names of de Juana´s victims.
The label "mass murderer" is indeed redundant, as it is already mentioned that he's been convicted of killing multiple people. In addition, assigning him the label "mass murderer" skews the neutral point of view of the article (as some label him a terrorist, others a soldier)
WP:BLP is very clear on the removal of biased and misleading information - see
here.
gaillimhConas tá tú?22:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)reply
What is clear is that he is not a soldier of any army because he belongs to a terrorist group labeled as that by the European Union, and the deffinition of mass murderer is also clear in any dictionary and in Wikipedia. Perhaps what is not neutral is your point of view.
The article is to be written in a neutral point of view, which includes the elimination of any potential biased or misleading information, or labels, in this case. It is mentioned in the article that he's been convicted of terrorism by the Spanish government already
gaillimhConas tá tú?23:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)reply
I will provide an anwer to just one point of difference as requested in third party opinion page, whether mass murderer is appropriate. First we need to find a
WP:RS that calls him as such second it will fail
WP:NPOV even if it is found. It is much more acceptable to call him as convicted of murdering number(give the correct number) of people. Then cite it properly. That will pass neutrality test.
RaveenS23:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC).reply
The La Haine source I have inserted is clearly not neutral but for the minimal use (names and dates) it gets should be enough.
It however mentions cases where the Spanish government has yielded before strikers.
If somebody can add a neutral source on those, they would be mention-worthy.
--
Error00:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Bot report : Found duplicate references !
In
the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)
"Times" :
Catan, Thomas. [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article1329302.ece ''Shackled and emaciated, Eta killer pleads for peace from his deathbed'']. ''The Times''. [[5 February]] [[2007]]. Accessed online [[7 February]] [[2007]].
[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article1459269.ece Prison staff deny manslaughter by neglect over suicide of inmate - Times Online<!-- Bot generated title -->
Several Wikipedia users have deleted all the information I have added. I have twice as many sources in my additions as they do in the original version they insist on restoring. As a matter of fact, they have deleted every pieces of information I have added since it presents substantial data about this person's biographical record that don't match the original article in which most of what he has done in his life was ignored. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Genericcoop (
talk •
contribs)
21:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Please remove the following text from the "Prison sentence" section - "(Gallizo <ref>http://webmasterchaos.tripod.com/id25.html</ref> and The Shield <ref>http://webmasterchaos.tripod.com/id23.html</ref>)". As you can see it's a self-published tripod hosted site, and the rest of the sentence is sourced by the Times reference at the end of the sentence. Thanks. 2 lines of K30314:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)reply
Much of the information in the introductory paragraph is repeated again in the main section and I would propose that the introduction should be shortened. It would make the text read better because it would be less repetitious.
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Iñaki de Juana Chaos/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Article might get volatile now that subject is back in the news; however, several substantial and well-cited subsections make this article B-class currently. -
Fsotrain0902:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Last edited at 02:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC).
Substituted at 19:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)