From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hurricane Doreen (1977) has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria . If you can improve it further,
please do so . If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it .Article milestones Date Process Result
July 12, 2012
Good article nominee Listed
This review is
transcluded from
Talk:Hurricane Doreen (1977)/GA1 . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer:
MathewTownsend (
talk ·
contribs )
23:18, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
reply
review
Just a few comments:
I made some edits that you are free to change.
[1]
"developed from a tropical disturbance offshore the coast of Africa. After developing on August 13," - kind of repetitious
San Carlos needs disambiguation
"making Doreen the wettest tropical cyclone for the state of Nevada." - as of that date?
but you don't know when a view is reading this article. Perhaps they're read it a year from now, and that statement may not be true then. It's a rule somewhere in MoS not to use uncertain dates. I've changed it.
MathewTownsend (
talk )
17:50, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
reply
I've changed it.
Otherwise the article looks fine. Will put on hold.
MathewTownsend (
talk )
17:02, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
reply
I've made a couple more copy edits.
[2]
GA review-see
WP:WIAGA for criteria (and
here for what they are not)
Is it reasonably well written ?
a. prose:
clear and concise , respects
copyright laws , correct spelling and grammar:
b. complies with
MoS for
lead ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction , and
list incorporation :
Is it factually accurate and
verifiable ?
a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the
guide to layout :
b. provides
in-line citations from
reliable sources where necessary:y
c.
no original research :
Is it broad in its coverage ?
a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:
b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see
summary style ):
Does it follow the
neutral point of view policy .
fair representation without bias:
Is it stable ?
no
edit wars , etc:
Does it contain
images to illustrate the topic?
a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales :
b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions :
Overall :
Pass or Fail:
Pass!
Congratulations!
MathewTownsend (
talk )
18:12, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
reply