This article is within the scope of WikiProject El Salvador, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
El Salvador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.El SalvadorWikipedia:WikiProject El SalvadorTemplate:WikiProject El SalvadorEl Salvador articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the
project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Central America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America articles
Anyone for a merge?
This storm wasn't that notable. Landfall in Central America and 3 deaths are the only things setting this storm apart. The article is a little shallow but pretty good. I'm leaning merge though. --
Hurricane Ericarchive -- my dropsonde03:09, 8 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Weak keep. Revisit this later, but right now I think it should stay here. Very rare path, only landfall ever in western Honduras, fears of a repeat of Mitch, etc. --
Golbez04:51, 8 January 2006 (UTC)reply
That works. I just thought the format was the main article is for retired/extremely important/used once, and all others got the year notifier.
Hurricanehink02:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Actually a pretty complete article, except for a few missing crucial items. It needs a see also section, "preparations" and "impact" should be split, and more on impact is needed.
Jdorje20:23, 12 January 2006 (UTC)reply
It might be, but has anyone seen if there are any useful Spanish links? One more thing that should be added in the article is another image, maybe one of it at landfall? The storm history needs to be sourced, and preferibly updated using the TCR. Mentioning the monthly report isn't useful. The article doesn't even mention that Adrian weakened to a tropical depression before landfall, which is a must.
Hurricanehink (
talk)
00:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Is it possible to place two diagrams in this section to show what is unusual about it's track? While the text may be accurate, it is still a bit hard to visualise.
PrometheusX30300:10, 13 February 2006 (UTC)reply
OK, shall we discuss? This article is somewhat important, since it was rare in affecting Central America. Does that mean it should be Mid-importance? For EPAC, low-importance means it affected land, which for most storms means affecting Mexico, SW US, or Hawaii. This storm is one of only five to strike Central America. I think that should be mid-importance, but let's agree first before changing it again. ♬♩
Hurricanehink (
talk)
17:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC)reply
I think you should take it back to WPTC talk page first. One-of-five does not sound like a significant record, and I think this would call for a lot of reassessments if it is considered one. There isn't much interest in this article as is. I know I'm not the only one who doesn't like Very-low, but as long as it exists, what is wrong with putting most articles in the Low category?
Potapych (
talk)
18:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)reply
As I already said, low importance means it affected land in general, which is appropriate for most hurricanes and tropical storms in the EPAC (other than fishspinners). However, this one is more important than that, because it hit an area only struck four other times on record. Yes, I do think one in five is significant - not quite enough for high (obviously), but still somewhat significant for it to be mid importance. ♬♩
Hurricanehink (
talk)
18:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)reply
I disagree with this because ratings are supposed to reflect external interest, not what the storm did. It is not very important to the project either because it has gone over three years without significant improvement.
Potapych (
talk)
18:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)reply