This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because... (your reason here) --
Igec133 (
talk)
12:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Összefogás was founded as a platform to unite the Hungarian parties and MKÖ-MKS was an electoral alliance disguised as party so they didn't need the 7% threshold, the article is written like Összefogás absorbed MKP & Hid which isn't the case. Alliance was a merger of MKP & Bridge but Bridge left and was refounded (and there was no important election during the time) and Alliance now is dominated by the MKP faction (which still exists within in the party) and is ideologically identical. So i propose MKP & Alliance and rename the history section.
I disagree with the merge since the party still has two factions – Magyar Közösségi Összefogás and SMK–MKP. It's also possible that in the future they will cooperate with another minority party.--
CaeCalig (
talk)
15:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)reply
I support the restructuring, for what I'm reading there's a true mess in what respects the Hungarian minority parties and their coalitions so the restructuring to make it into less articles that better explain the mergers and dissolutions (especially if the other parties are supersmall) makes sense.
Tidjani Saleh (
talk)
08:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)reply
I fully support the restructuring proposal, with all due respects, the page is currently a mess. I’d propose, minimally, a massive reorganisation of the page because it is difficult to truly be informed with a page like this.
Lexoomfie (
talk)
09:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.