Humanitarian protection was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the
good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Frankly, I do not think that this article is close to meeting the Good Article criteria. It's not broad and doesn't mention major issues in humanitarian proctection including
refugee resettlement and the relationship between humanitarian protection and human rights. It reads more like a start class article than a fully developed Good Article. The citations also need work. Ideally, the article would cite mostly scholarly works giving accounts of humanitarian protection, rather than primary sources from agencies that are directly involved in providing humanitarian protection. The Ferris source shouldn't be given in full on multiple occasions, instead use {{sfn}} or {{rp}}. (
t ·
c) buidhe03:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)reply
You
undid my tagging here, but there being an unmet need for humanitarian protection is an opinion, not a fact, and must be attributed to the source. Same for there being insufficient funding for humanitarian protection. (
t ·
c) buidhe05:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Yes, the lead does not always need citations, but opinions still need to be attributed per
WP:NPOV, and it's not obvious to me where this is cited in the body. (
t ·
c) buidhe23:48, 4 April 2023 (UTC)reply