This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Oops! I am creating these from a template in my userspace (see
here), which I made a long time ago (starting a second batch of these). Since they're PD it's easier that way to format them to get them included in at least a rough draft for now. The tags in my userspace got dated by the bot. I'll undate them. I've never posted this article before, and I doubt anyone else has either.
Calliopejen1 (
talk)
15:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Alright. But I have a funny deja'vu feeling about this article, and I'm going to keep an eye on it. As of right now it severely biased and doesn't meet Wiki-Standards. I'm actually a little ashamed it's in the Main Namespace. Carry on. --
Matthew Glennon (T/C\D)
15:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Okay. Feel free to wikify and de-US-reportify it. You should be more ashamed that previously we had no article at all! I've made many of these before, so that may be your deja vu feeling. At least one (don't remember which) as AFD'd but kept, maybe unanimously, as being a worthwhile (but flawed, obviously) start to an article on an important topic.
Calliopejen1 (
talk)
15:52, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
Now I know where I've seen this info before... You're the Editor that posts all of these, I've had a disagreement with you before about these articles. You're an activist for something... and you create these articles in the name of it. I frown, only because you create a huge quantity of these articles, and get the information out there, but you sound not much better than a conspiracy theorist because of the quality of your articles. Might I suggest leaving all of these articles in your userspace until one is polished, then moving it to the mainspace. Finish one article completely instead of putting out so many half-completed articles.--
Matthew Glennon (T/C\D)
16:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I'm not an activist for anything. Check out
WP:LOCPROJ--I paste tons of PD content from everywhere. There is no rule that only completed articles can go into mainspace. Everyone here is a volunteer and can edit what they feel like editing. Someone later will probably take an interest in these and clean them up. See
Wikipedia:Article development. They have appropriate tags to warn readers about their POV.
Calliopejen1 (
talk)
16:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on
Human trafficking in Kenya. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.