![]() | Huascarán National Park has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 17, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't think a national park should be categorized in the Archaeological sites in Peru category. Sure, there are archaeological sites within the park, but the parks themselves are primarily parks, not archaeological sites. If nobody has objections I will be removing the archaeological site category from this page as well as Rio Abiseo National Park for the same reason. Gsd97jks 14:00, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
I'm fine with that. Didn't see the separate listing for Gran Pajaten, so go ahead and take the cat off Rio Abiseo. I know overcategorization can get weary, but IMHO it is WAY better than huge long lists ( Like List of archaeological sites sorted by country that are static and impossible to maintain. (Once I make sure everything in there is in the right cat, I'm going to ask that it be deleted.) Pschemp | Talk 00:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague ( talk · contribs) 16:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
"...is managed by the Peruvian Network of Protected Natural Areas: SERNANP." This acronym appears to be for the Spanish form of the name, perhaps you should include the Spanish full-length name in parentheses?
"Huascaran National Park, designated as a World Heritage Site..." It is redundant to spell out the entire name again in the intro.
"...with emblematic species of plants such as the Queen of the Andes..." I get what you are trying to say, but readers might ask emblematic of what? Peru? The Andes? or just the park?
"..proposed the Peruvian Congress a bill..." Link to the Congress, and it would be proposed to the Peruvian Congress
"Definite delimitation of Huascaran National Park was possible by the reversion of land to state control." Was the land seized or purchased?
"...which is the World's highest tropical mountain range." Lowercase on world's
"The geographical features inside the park include..." You should link to all the geographical features that have articles (valleys, glaciers, glacial lakes)
For the Climate section, what is the park's (or regions) actual climate classification?
In Ecology, link to all of the biome you listed off
When discussing some of the species, you mentioned some of the park's sectors. If there is enough info, maybe you can create a subsection of Geography detailing all of the park's official sectors?
In activities, link to all of the different sciences you listed.
Throughout the article, you mention different towns and settlements within or near the park. Can you link to any?
in Geography, maybe you can mention some of the parks specific features (Llangunco Lake, Mount Copa)?
This article is in very solid shape, interesting topic and a nice job handling it! Just a few things to polish before this one can pass. QatarStarsLeague ( talk) 16:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)