This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
According to the NED, a US government funded entity, Hu Jia's Beijing Zhiaixing Information Counseling Center received funding of $179,113 in 2006, from NED as well as US State Department:
It's being two months and there seems to be no objection to this fact, so I'll go ahead and add it to the article. Please feel free to improved the article, but please do so without removing this fact. Thanks!
Can you give a reason why the funding section should be on its own? As of now, there is only one sentence about funding, so having a section devoted to it would be poor style. Also, the mention of funding easily fits into the section on Hu's activist activities. Finally, your attempt to make a single section for nothing other than to say Hu has gotten money from the U.S. (especially since you are calling the section Source of funding rather than just Funding) smacks of POV-pushing—trying to just just the section heading to imply something that you know would get deleted if you said it explicitly. —
Politizertalk/contribs02:52, 27 October 2008 (UTC)reply
When you undid my edit, you also undid formatting changes and addition of clarification about the name of the Zhiaixing Center.
Also, please don't go around telling other people not to revert your edits without discussion, when you were the first one who came and reverted mine. You have done this before—you revert others' work and then say "no reverting without discussion" in attempt to protect your own. I will remind you that you have already been blocked once for that kind of disruptive editing. —
Politizertalk/contribs02:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Please see below example for separate funding section:
That is a large section with a lot of information (5-10 refs, I think), and in an article that does not have an existing section where that information would fit naturally. This article already has a section where that information can go (
Activism). Also, RWB is a large organization with large worldwide operations, so there is a lot more to say about their funding than just Hu's organization. I agree that funding should be mentioned, but not in its very own section—it's undue weight. The information we have in the article about funding is not even about Hu's funding in general, but only about the funding for a single organization with which he is affiliated. Finally, notice that the section in
Reporters Without Borders is called Funding, not Source of funding (which is what you have been trying to insert into this article). —
Politizertalk/contribs03:05, 27 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Feel free to change the section to "Funding", but you removed it. Now this fact is in a sction called "Activism" which is not relevant to the fact.
Bobby fletcher (
talk)
03:19, 27 October 2008 (UTC)reply
I removed it for the multiple reasons given above. And, once again, I didn't remove any information, I only moved information out of a section. I removed a section heading, not a fact (in fact, I added a fact). —
Politizertalk/contribs03:20, 27 October 2008 (UTC)reply
The funding was for funding the activism of a group he was affiliated with. So it's relevant. You're going to have to think of a better reason to include a frivolous extra section than that, because the way you had the section included before was verging on POV-pushing. —
Politizertalk/contribs03:23, 27 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Gibberish deleted
"In response to Hu's nomination—and fellow Chinese dissident Gao Zhisheng's nomination—China's foreign ministry has stated it hopes the "right person" is selected to win the Nobel Peace Prize, claiming that some past laureates were unsuitable choices.It is reported later that Nobel Peace Prize will never belongs to the persoen like Hu who are so young and absolutely have no contribution to the world peace for sure."
I have just modified 7 external links on
Hu Jia (activist). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified 5 external links on
Hu Jia (activist). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.