This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Changed picture, because the old one was very small. -- Plumcouch 02:31, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Changed to new picture, because on the magazine cover, half his head was missing and there was half of an article on the bottom. -- Plumcouch 17:05, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
Some of the statements in here could really use a source. Especially "Hrithik is generally regarded as a down-to-earth, hard-working actor, neither an egomaniac nor a playboy." Who regards him this way? DejahThoris 08:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
According to the article, and the source, the extra thumb is on his right hand. I can't see it in the Dhoom 2 screenshot - is it the way he's holding his hand or did they airbrush it out? -- Sam Blanning (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Can somebody add some copyrighted picture of Hrithik Roshan?? -- Lravikumar 14:39, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Rakesh Kumar (Mandalay Myanmar )
24.12.167.204 19:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)what happened to the green dhoom 2 pic u see on google?
I'm 5'10" exact and met Hrithik Roshan in person. He was not taller than me, and he does use lifts like all celebrities. Sometimes, I do look like my 5'11" or 6' friends, and it's all cause of my posture and physique. End of story. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Minist3r ( talk • contribs) 11:55, 17 January 2007 (UTC).
Thanks xCentaur | ☎ 17:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Should'nt this article include the the fact that he has done commercials and endorses brands etc., atleast its more significant than the 'controversy' (i haven't even heard of that). i guess someone needs to expand the cultural impact of Hritik Roshan when KNPH exploded to put it into context. like youngsters look upto him, fashion icon etc.
i remember one such instance when he played a charity cricket match and got more applause than Sachin or any other cricketer. Now that is big.
almost every paper in India has 'tabloid-al' tendencies, so i agree we cant use tht. found a good example of how it can be worded without brands
Gaurdian UK
I just updated the references of the page, and was surprised to find we don't have much content related to his film career prior to 2000. His 1986 release Bhagwan Dada (film), redirects to an individual by the same name. His other two movies as a child don't even exist on WP. Does anyone have any content related to these three movies? Also, are there any editors who'd be willing to help out in researching this stuff? xCentaur | ☎ 20:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
I propose a re-work of the Awards and Honours sections, which are currently seperated right now.
I'd like to hear all editors' views on this, and if you have any ideas or comments, please add them here. If there's no objection in 48 hours, then I'll go ahead with the re-work. Happy editing!
xCentaur | ☎ 21:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Is his son's name Rehaan or Hrehaan? I know it doesn't make one hell of a difference when you say the name, but I'd like to add the correct name to his article. Does anyone have any references supporting either name conclusively? xCentaur | ☎ 05:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
In his list of films at the end of the article, nominations for Filmfare Awards are mentioned. While these are notable, no doubt, I'd like to question whether they add any value to the page. Only noting Filmfare Awards nominations next to his list of films while ignoring the rest seems illogical. They should either be removed entirely, or added in as a seperate paragraph in the article. Either way, those nominations shouldn't be in his filmography. All editors watching this page - any views on this? If there are no comments in 48 hours, I'll rework that section as suggested above. Thanks xCentaur | ☎ 13:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Ok, so we have to choose between removing them entirely, or keeping them in a seperate sub-section. Either way, its unanimous that its gotta go from the filmography. I've got board exams on right now so it might take a while,but I will remove it asap... unless someone else gets to it first ;)
xCentaur |
☎
10:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
I oppose adding the filmfare awards he has won into the infobox. It gives undue importance to the award, making the other awards he has won seem second-rung. If we can indeed find a decent number of his nominations and awards, of course with references, then I propose we have a seperate page for Hrithik's awards, somewhat based on this format - Beyoncé_Knowles_awards_and_nominations.
I'd also like to propose the same for the SRK page, but since he's got a hell of a lot more, re-working his page would take longer. Lets first work out an acceptable format on Hrithik, and then move on to the larger pages, like SRK and Big B.
Cheers! xCentaur | ☎ 07:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
I worked on getting the Filmfare Awards included in the Actor Infobox template, still agonising over whether Filmfare is the award that should be listed or some others like IIFA or National Awards, but I'm also convinced that Filmfare is the most notable one. It's just a way of filling in the fields in the Infobox just like it is for every other actor (Western included). otherwise the infobox looks pretty bare and there's not much point in an infobox at all if the same logic is used (Hrithik's birthdate is in the article too).
That's a pretty good example you've got there, about Beyonce, a whole page listing her awards. I just glanced at it and I'm not sure that some of her awards are notable but that's jut my opinion. Lemme give a more relevant example: BBC Film Cafe is a radio show that has it's own "award ceremony" (on radio) and actors/actresses are presented with awards (on radio) for whatever they have excelled at, and it's all done on radio! :) Is this a notable award? I don't think it is worthy of being listed on an actor's article-page, but it may be worthy of listing on a page like Beyonce's. Hmmm, it's all a very murky grey area if you ask me.
Speaking of which, I understand that Wikipedia is generally an ongoing project but this article sorely needs more biographical content on Hrithik before worrying too much about which awards are notable for the infobox, etc. Just my thoughts. Ekantik talk 05:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Hahahaha, 100+ awards for KNPH. I was actually in India at that time and the whole country went crazy over that movie. Ekantik talk 05:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
I've just seen the results of the latest Filmfare Awards and that Hrithik has been awarded Best Actor for Dhoom 2. I really think we need to revisit the idea of keeping a record of awardsin the infobox, as infoboxes help the article by providing a concise "boom" summary of the person. And also because, well, that is the whole point of the infobox determined by multi-editor collaboration? Comments requested of course, thanks. Ekantik talk 16:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
As per WP:TRIV, articles shouldn't have trivia sections. Now I know that this isn't followed uniformly, but we might as well start with it somewhere. So I'll be integrating the trivia section in the main article content in 48 hours, unless there are any objections.
Also, his nickname Duggu doesn't really need to be in the lead para. IMHO, both Duggu and Bholunath should be removed from the article, since (a)we know they're true, but we don't have refs (b)we don't have any quotes of anyone notable calling him that (c)they're unencyclopedic, most kids end up with half a dozen nicknames by the time they pass out of high school, who cares anyway? Again, I'll remove it in 48 hours unless someone objects.
Thanks xC | ☎ 11:46, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone have citations for Delhi 6 and/or Sashank?
Also, all editors please note that Dhoom 3 has been officially scrapped - see this.
I mentioned these because they are recurring additions to this page - any addition of these three movies should be removed.
Thanks
xC | ☎ 05:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
In 2001, a rumour alleging Roshan to have made bad remarks on Nepal and its people caused outrage in the country. Several newspapers carried the report, leading to student protests, in which four people died. [11] The unrest the protests caused forced the government to cancel a flight from Kathmandu to India.[12]Later the Indian embassy and the actor himself clarified that he had made no such disparaging remarks against Nepal. [13]
In 2006, at the London press conference for his film Krrish, Roshan said that he knew it was time to leave Shanghai and Hong Kong after six weeks of stunt training and go home when his eyes started "turning into little slits like the Chinese".[14]
The comments are against chinese people this article must be banned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.180.72.220 ( talk • contribs)
Delhi 6 does not star Roshan - this page
Kismat Talkies - this page shows the film hasnt even started filming yet and so is still in planning stage
As for Krrish 2 - see this
In short, Krrish 2 and Delhi 6 should be removed whenever you see them, while Kismat Talkies should only be allowed to remain in the article if there is a valid source from the producer/director/etc that the film will be shot. xC | ☎ 17:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
I reverted the expansion of the intro. It is a single revert and I do not wish to engage in an edit war.
Reasons for reverting-
regards, xC | ☎ 18:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Regards, -- Shahid • Talk2me 18:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hrithik Roshan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:33, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Isn't Roshan a patronymic, adapted from his grandfather Roshan's name? If so, shouldn't he be addressed as Hrithik throughout the article? King Prithviraj II ( talk)
Hi... Remove Infidelity, nepotism from this and kangana as a reason for divorce in personal life. Screenshot attached below.
Reasons of HR Divorce .. [5] [6]
Hritik wife has completely cleared that kangana was not the reaason of their divorce. [7]
Below are the articles which have been quoted for the statements related to Kangana in HR's wikipedia.
Is it possible to get these articles changed/edited/removed.
This would help expedite changes reflection process.
Though Roshan maintained that they parted amicably,[145] the media reported that the split was due to infidelity on his part, linking him with several actresses, most notably his Krrish 3 co-star Kangana Ranaut.[142]
Owing to a lack of evidence, the Mumbai Police closed the case later that year.[147]
[11]
49.126.83.1 (
talk)
09:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Hrithik Roshan has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This line Owing to a lack of evidence, the Mumbai Police closed the case later that year.[151] in Personal information is incorrect.
The case of Cyber Stalking is still going on as confirmed by Hrithik Roshan in his official statement:
Also, even his Ex wife, Sussanne Khan has fully supported him and exposed the Stalker more than twice. http://www.dnaindia.com/bollywood/report-this-is-how-sussanne-khan-supported-hrithik-roshan-after-kangana-ranaut-s-latest-allegations-2542959 BlackPanther16 ( talk) 06:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Hrithik Roshan has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove: In 2016, he filed a lawsuit against his Krrish 3 co-star Kangana Ranaut, accusing her of cyber stalking and harassment.[149] Denying the charges, Ranaut filed a counter-charge against Roshan, claiming that his lawsuit was an attempt to cover up their affair for the benefit of his divorce proceedings.[150] Owing to a lack of evidence, the Mumbai Police closed the case later that year.[151]
This entire segment is factually incorrect. The case is NOT closed. And there has more than enough evidence that show that Hrithik Roshan was a victim of not only Stalking but also Unsubstantiated revenge slander by a Publicity hungry Stalker. Request you to kindly remove her name from this Personal information section as it is a legal case and not really a personal issue.
Instead, please mention the following:
Hrithik statement on his Divorce in 2013:
"This is my greatest tribute to love. Sussanne is and always will be the love of my life for the rest of my life. If her smiles are brighter without me my love for her must accomplish that. Unconditional." Source: https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/celebrities/story/sussanne-is-will-always-be-love-of-my-life-hrithik-220792-2013-12-14
Hrithik Roshan and Sussanne Khan are planning to reconcile again. Source: http://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment/news/bollywood-news/article/hrithik-roshan-sussanne-khan-remarriage-after-divorce-ex-couple-reunite/191281 BlackPanther16 ( talk) 07:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Hrithik Roshan has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
PLEASE REMOVE THIS ENTIRE SENTENCE. IT WAS A FAKE NEWS THAT WAS CREATED BY POLITICIANS IN NEPAL TO GENARATE HATE AGAINST INDIA AS HRITHIK WAS GETTING WAY TOO POPULAR THERE AND IN NONE OF THE ONLY TWO TV INTERVIEWS HE GAVE BACK THEN DID HE EVER TALK ABOUT NEPAL. AND THIS DOES NOT EVEN BELONG IN "PERSONAL INFORMATION" SECTION. REQUEST YOU TO PLEASE REMOVE THE WHOLE THING.
Later that December, he was involved in a controversy when Nepalese newspapers accused him of stating in a Star Plus interview that he hated Nepal and its people. This led to protests in the country, a ban on screening of his films, and four people's deaths after street violence.[152] Nepalese people threatened to "bury [him] alive" if he ever visited the country.[153] Star Plus, for its part, stated that Roshan "did not touch upon Nepal." The violence calmed down after Roshan wrote a two-page rejoinder in which he denied having made any claim against the country. Nepali actress Manisha Koirala helped distribute it to newspapers and a local television station.[154] BlackPanther16 ( talk) 10:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. The section is well supported by sources. If you think, it should not be there, please discuss and gain a consensus. —
LeoFrank
Talk
15:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)This
edit request to
Hrithik Roshan has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Citations 149, 150 & 151 are paraphrased and the verified articles suggests, actually otherwise. The case is not closed as per the records instated by the authorities of the Mumbai Police. I am citing a link for your reference that verifies the fore-mentioned information provided by me: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/photo-features/hrithik-roshan-kangana-ranaut-everything-you-need-to-know-about-their-controversy/lull-before-the-storm/photostory/61005243.cms
Hoping to see the information corrected and the paraphrased citations removed. Archietherave10 ( talk) 15:49, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Archietherave10 ( talk) 13:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC) In 2016, he filed a lawsuit against his Krrish 3 co-star Kangana Ranaut, accusing her of cyber stalking and harassment.[149] Denying the charges, Ranaut filed a counter-charge against Roshan, claiming that his lawsuit was an attempt to cover up their affair for the benefit of his divorce proceedings.[150] Owing to a lack of evidence, the Mumbai Police closed the case later that year.[151]
The above mentioned statements are no correct. According to the most recent development, the case filed by Hrithik Roshan on Kangana Ranaut is still pending investigation by Mumbai Police. The sources cited currently for the same are dated Nov'16 whereas the latest development is cited below by me. THE ABOVE MENTIONED STATEMENTS NEEDS TO BE CHANGED TO THE FOLLOWING.
In 2016, he filed a lawsuit against his Krrish 3 co-star Kangana Ranaut, accusing her of cyber stalking and harassment. Denying the charges, Ranaut falsely claimed that his lawsuit was an attempt to cover up their affair for the benefit of his divorce proceedings. Further investigations are pending by Mumbai Police and the case is still going on. [1] Archietherave10 ( talk) 13:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
CHANGE
In 2016, he filed a lawsuit against his Krrish 3 co-star Kangana Ranaut, accusing her of cyber stalking and harassment.[149] Denying the charges, Ranaut filed a counter-charge against Roshan, claiming that his lawsuit was an attempt to cover up their affair for the benefit of his divorce proceedings.[150] Owing to a lack of evidence, the Mumbai Police closed the case later that year.[151]
TO
In 2016, he filed a lawsuit against his Krrish 3 co-star Kangana Ranaut, accusing her of cyber stalking and harassment. Denying the charges, Ranaut falsely claimed that his lawsuit was an attempt to cover up their affair for the benefit of his divorce proceedings. Further investigations are pending by Mumbai Police and the case is still going on. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archietherave10 ( talk • contribs) 12:00, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
In the Personal Life section I have removed " for the benefit of his divorce proceedings" Because 1) The citation provided does not state anything to suggest that it was a cover up for the divorce proceedings 2) The first line states that the divorce was amicable and hence if the divorce was amicable then there is no reason for a cover up. 3) The Two statements being contradictory only one can be true or none can be true 4) However there was a divorce which is amicable till date and there is no source to suggest that there had to be a cover up. 5) Hence by simple logic the latter is untrue 6) Hence I have removed the latter.
If any issues with the edit please talk to me on my talk page ( Dpshow ( talk) 17:23, 28 August 2018 (UTC))
The previous statement "Owing to a lack of evidence, the Mumbai Police closed the case later that year" is changes to "Mumbai Police filed a report regarding the case in November 2016 and hence forth nothing has been clearly reported about the case."
1) The Article citation states that Mumbai police Filed a 'NIL Report' and hence case will be closed 2) A 'NIL Report' is like other reports files by Police like 'Summary A', 'Summary B', 'Summary C'. These are all reports filed by Police after an FIR (First Information Report) is file to police. All there reports are submitted in court. 3) After these reports are filed the court decides whether it wants to accept the report or deny it. 4) Irrespective of these reports court proceedings carry on. 5) Hence stating that because of a 'NIL Report' a case has been closed is factually in correct and against Indian Penal Court. 6) Hence I have changed the statement to a more factual and descriptive statement.
Thank You ( Dpshow ( talk) 13:43, 30 August 2018 (UTC))