This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
It is requested that an image or photograph of Hornslet wind-turbine collapse be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The article is not worth deletion for the following reason:
It is a good example of a collapse of a wind turbine. Collapses of wind turbines occur much more frequently as commonly thought!
The video of the collapse is one of the most viewn videos on Youtube. A Wikipedia-Article with all background information is very sensitive.
Thanks for the explanation. I didn't notice your explanation. Since there is one I shall again remove the PROD tag. Also, just so you know, I am going to propose this article for deletion per
WP:AFD. This is a single non-notable event. You might want to simply merge this article into a
wind turbine article. ----
Steve Quinn (
talk)
08:30, 19 September 2010 (UTC)reply
read also
WP:N and
WP:EVENT. Wikipedia is not a news source: it takes more than just routine news reports about a single event or topic to constitute significant coverage. For example, routine news coverage such as press releases, public announcements, sports coverage, and tabloid journalism is not significant coverage. Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of the event is not considered significant coverage. The Wikimedia project Wikinews covers topics of present news coverage. For guidelines on whether an event is notable, see
Wikipedia:Notability (events).
I have just modified one external link on
Hornslet wind-turbine collapse. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.