GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Midnightblueowl ( talk · contribs) 19:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Interesting topic. I'll field the review if there are no objections.
Midnightblueowl (
talk)
19:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
At present I do not think that the article meets GA criteria on a number of points. If these can be rectified within a reasonable period of time however then I would be happy to reconsider that decision:
Two weeks have past and given that the recommended time for waiting at GAN is seven days, I think it time to wrap this up. I'm afraid that it's going to be a fail at this time, but good luck with improving the article in future and hopefully it can be re-nominated at a later date once that has been done. 21:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)