This has been set up as a parallel to several long-established articles. So, does it have a special pov to push, which the existing articles don't offer? Why does it range so far from the history of Roman Catholicism in Spain? What about
Roman Catholicism in Spain and
Religion in Spain? No mention of
Alhambra Decree? I don't get it, I suppose.--
Wetman (
talk)
05:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The rationale for this article is that it follows a pattern where an article on
X is an article about X as it exists today where as an article titled
History of X is an article about the history of X. The article on
X will often have a "History" section. If there is sufficient material on the "History of X" to warrant a separate article, then the article on
X will summarize the History article in its "History" section. (see
WP:SUMMARY)
- This pattern is common throughout Wikipedia. We have
United States /
History of the United States and many other
X /
History of X pairs for countries.
- With respect to religions, we have
Christianity and
History of Christianity.
Roman Catholic Church and
History of the Roman Catholic Church.
- Compare
Roman Catholicism in the Republic of Ireland with
History of Christianity in Ireland
- We also have
Roman Catholicism in Mexico /
History of Roman Catholicism in Mexico,
Roman Catholicism in the United States /
History of Roman Catholicism in the United States.
- This is the rationale for the pair
Roman Catholicism in Spain /
History of Roman Catholicism in Spain.
- Hope that helps.
- As for the omission of the
Alhambra Decree, I am not very knowledgeable in Spanish history and so I wasn't able to get all of the History of Roman Catholicism in Spain into the article at once. That's why I asked for help at
WP:SPAIN. Thank you for pointing out the omission; I'll be adding it next. Please be
bold and expand the article yourself.
- --
Richard (
talk)
06:25, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Wetman, I just visited your user page and discovered that you are far more experienced and knowledgeable (though prickly and opinionated) Wikipedian than I had given you credit for when I read your comment above. (In truth, I visted your user page to see just how much of a Wikipedia NOOB you were). So, I apologize for the excessively pedantic response that I posted above. However, now that I know who you are, I am driven to ask: Why the hell did you ask such a silly question? I try not to bite newbies but an old hand like you needs a bite or two for "not getting it".
- P.S. Now that I've thoroughly chastised you and insulted you, perhaps you'd care to explain your question "Why does it range so far from the history of Roman Catholicism in Spain?" Why do you think the article "ranges far from the history of Roman Catholicism in Spain"? What needs to be done to get it to come closer to the "history of Roman Catholicism in Spain"?
- --
Richard (
talk)
07:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
reply
The original article was created largely by Pseudo-Richard. From the start, it has lacked two things: an introduction, and any coverage at all on the _start_ of Catholicism in the Iberian peninsula. It starts with "Visigoths".
I'll leave it to others to concoct an intro but I'll put in some information on the beginnings.
Ordinary Person (
talk)
11:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
reply
Not to be that guy, but there's a lot said, specifically about the early history of Catholicism in Spain, and the Arian heresy, but there are no sources whatsoever to back up what is said. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Alcibiades979 (
talk •
contribs)
14:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
History of the Catholic Church in Spain. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Cheers.—
InternetArchiveBot (
Report bug)
13:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
reply