The contents of the History of poker in print page were merged into Poker on 24 August 2017 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Poker#Early books discussing poker]] The anchor (#Early books discussing poker) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

We already have a nicely sourced History of poker. This article would fit nicely as a section of that existing article, and does not appear to require its own article. WikiDan61 ^ChatMe! _ReadMe!! 20:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC) reply

• Support. There is no reason to fragment miniscule aspects from the main article. History of poker can easily accommodate much more development before any rationale WP:SPLITting is warranted. --Animalparty-- ( talk) 00:35, 28 April 2015 (UTC) reply
• Support, as above. 2005 ( talk) 04:09, 28 April 2015 (UTC) reply
• Comment I'm not so sure this is a valid merge after all. As I examine the article, it is full of unsourced claims. I will contact the author to see if these claims are verifiable. If not, this article might better be deleted. WikiDan61 ^ChatMe! _ReadMe!! 12:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC) reply
• Support merging essay. "History of poker in print" alone is non-notable. Mr. Guye ( talk) 23:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Agree with merge; it can be disputed and even deleted on the target if that is preferred; I've also simplified the text to a list in order for it to work better in the existing history section (which is based on texts, not surprisingly).  Done Klbrain ( talk) 21:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC) reply