![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I'm sorry folks, but this article is horrendous. I propose a restructure, and am starting a new, temporary, page, Vermont History, which will include all the information currently in the History section of the basic Vermont article, and the current History of Vermont page. I will put statements that can't be easily documented, like the Olaf Tomsson allegation, in an undocumented statesments section, that will not be transferred unless someone can find and provide a quote (I don't believe it and won't pursue trying to document it, but please feel free.)
History of Vermont
Pre-Columbian
European settlement
Colonial history
The Vermont Republic
Statehood
Early 19th century
Civil War
Later 19th century
Early 20th century
Later 20th century
The new century
Tidbits
Undocumented statements
((Documentation and links))
See also
References (DOCUMENTATION!, there is none!)
Further reading (a realistic list of Vermont-related volumes, not New England)
External links
Categories
Green Mountain Sailor 04:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
I don't see where political history goes. I have a sufficient but limited perspective of that, say 1860-1965 or so. There's mainly total nonsense on the Vermont page. Which is all undocumented and unreferenced, apparently the standard for most of the page, but very apparent in that section. Rant. I don't mind trying to sandwich in a little documented piece of history there, but it doesn't seem to fit. I'm not really up to fighting the crazies. I'm just a little amateur historian. Not looking for war. Student7 21:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Not really supposed to be using other articles in Wikipedia for reference. Only as good as our weakest link. We can use their footnotes if they have been vetted first, but can't quote unsupported Wikipedia articles. That would not make sense. Student7 ( talk) 21:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
This section is weak. I had read "somewhere" that the original settlers, where possible, had tried to elevate roads to protect them from flooding which could block road use during the spring thaw (ice blockages of rivers, e.g.). This was certainly true in the Northeast where roads ran along the western rise of the Barton River Valley. Probably less true in Chittenden, near the Lake and Rutland, etc. where is was flatter.
Elevated roads were discontinued when the train came through - it needed a slower grade. Also, some control over the rivers had been achieved by then. I'd appreciate any help. Student7 ( talk) 22:43, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Some colonial history was very exciting. If you are a Vermonter, you may wish Vermont had participated. It could hardly do so with so few people. Ethan Allen helped out in the Revolutionary War. A few people traversed it during the French and Indian War(s). Pretty much it. We can't "borrow" adjacent territory and pretend it is in Vermont! It isn't and wasn't! Student7 ( talk) 22:28, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
This title is confusing on two levels. 1. "Sstatehood" refers to becoming a country, not moving from territorial status to state of the US. 2. "Antebellum" means "Pre-Civil War" and should say so, directly. However, unless pre-war conditions set up Vermont's participation in the war, it's not a good descriptor. I propose splitting the section into "Sovereignty" and "Statehood." User:HopsonRoad 16:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on History of Vermont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:17, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
"Five thousand troops were stationed in Burlington at one point, outnumbering residents. About 500 of them died of disease." doesn't make it clear who died. Were they the soldiers or the residents? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historical Cartograph ( talk • contribs) 15:26, 14 January 2021 (UTC)