This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
History of Southeast Asia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shannonkhod, Lrncohen3.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 23:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi! I want to help complete the article and have started here: User:Wikirictor/sandbox2 If somebody likes to contribute, please do so. I also tried to maintain a neutral style. I created an infobox with, what i think are the subject's crucial episodes, all of whom need to be in here. Wikirictor ( talk) 12:53, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
I would be grateful for some help. I am still not certain how serious and valuable many of the sources are. The existing text needs to be reduced to the essential facts. There is nothing on Islam in the Philippines yet. All the best Wikirictor 08:05, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The term "post-classical" is controversial not mainstream. It's a recent invention by American professors authoring K-12 textbooks for publishers selling books to the public school system with mandates to be politically correct (equal) on issues of ethnicity. I challenge anyone here to find mainstream history sources that use this term for Southeast Asian history, who are not themselves World History practitioners. The article post-classical history is mostly the effort of a single Wikipedia editor using a lot of these world history textbooks. Wikipedia shouldn't be shoehorned into a minority POV as if it were mainstream. What do the world's best experts on this topic call it? I don't mean American K-12 textbook authors, or "Atlas" publishers, or certain California professors, but the experts on Asia at Harvard, Princeton, Oxford, etc.. -- Green C 16:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 16:23, 20 April 2020 (UTC)