This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Needs one, starting with the cite insanity in the Chinese section. — LlywelynII 16:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
No, you can't just reassign the locations to the Philippines on no evidence whatsoever. The Golden Chersonese had nothing to do with the Philippines and the Golden Island probably didn't either. Even the other Golden Island had nothing to do with the Philippines.
Given the nuttiness with the Chinese section and the FRINGE issues with the rest of the material, could someone kindly check to make sure the sourcing for the "Philippine" objects in Roman Egypt are actually WP:RS and justify their claim? — LlywelynII 16:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on History of Luzon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Luzon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
I recently demonstrated that the "Chinese governor of Luzon" is a myth originating from mistakes made by Western historians more than a century ago. The myth has been widely repeated in English-language secondary sources and has lately also been embraced and embellished in China, but this should not detract from the fact that it has no basis whatsoever in premodern Chinese sources. Please see my essay "Ko Ch'a-lao/Xu Chailao: A Mythical Ming Chinese Governor of Luzon" I recommend removing all references to a Ming Luzon governor from this article and the main article on Luzon. - Shao-yun Yang 2605:A000:1117:E2EB:6DC0:EE84:32EE:B8 ( talk) 01:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)