This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
This redirect contains information from WikiProject Library of Congress Country Studies, an attempt to incorporate useful information, text, and images from the
Library of Congress Country Studies and the related Country Profiles. These are
public domain documents with extensive information on many countries. You may see what other Lebanon-related contributions have been made by looking at the project's
subpage for Lebanon, which tracks progress for articles on Lebanon, and look for what contributions you can make, including updates to this article.Library of Congress Country StudiesWikipedia:WikiProject Library of Congress Country StudiesTemplate:WikiProject Library of Congress Country StudiesLibrary of Congress Country Studies articles
Reverted
I reverted what looks like an illogical act of vandalism. Lebanon remained under Arab rule for many centuries and cannot be erased this period from Wikipedia! --
N591real (
talk)
13:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:
http://www.ghazi.de/medieval.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
"donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For
legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under
fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and
referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original orplagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our
guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. —
Diannaa🍁 (
talk)
20:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Sorry, but I did not see that the reverted article was a copy of what written by another person and so it was a copyright violation. Now I am going to start a brand new article, written by myself. Hope that now there will be no problems.--
N591real (
talk)
21:37, 22 May 2017 (UTC)reply
I've removed some content from the new version that appears to be a copyright violation from
this website and provided attribution for material you copied from other Wikipedia articles. Please see your user talk page for more information. —
Diannaa🍁 (
talk)
20:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)reply
No problem. "Errare humanum est": I do a lot of mistakes, too....Anyway, I hope to be able to "understand" all these rules...(;-D)....Regards, --
N591real (
talk)
21:36, 23 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Lol. Says the sockpuppet, now blocked. @
Diannaa:, this seems to be a sockpuppet of someone who has been creating socks for quite a while and created two just a few days ago who have been chatting to each other elsewhere.
Doug Wellertalk15:42, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply