This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
What are all the titles in the "references" section ??? few seem to deal with Connecticut? Should they be dropped? Rjensen 20:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
I recently completed New York v. Connecticut, a Supreme Court case arising from a land dispute over the "Connecticut Gore," a region on NY's southwestern border with Pennsylvania over which CT claimed title. The case left the jurisdiction issue unresolved, and I haven't been able to find either a substantial reference to the region, or an explanation of how NY's claim to the land was finally recognized. Postdlf 18:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
This section seems to have been empty (excluding vandalism) throughout the whole edit history, although I could have missed something. Can it be merged into one of the adjacent sections if nothing earthshaking happened then?-- J Clear 17:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
It seems to me that this section merits its own article. It's certainly of article length and it's tacked onto the end of this article and seems rather out of place. I think it should be split off and a *See also* link left here. -- Elipongo ( Talk| contribs) 05:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
I have split off the section History of Connecticut industry and given it its own article. It still needs a lot of work so feel free to edit away! -- Elipongo ( Talk| contribs) 18:55, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
The Ku Klux Klan’s insignificance in Connecticut’s history doesn’t warrant such a large section. Should it be removed or reduced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awainacht ( talk • contribs) 12:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Why mention a single murder case but nothing on the flood of 1955, the development of the mill town, '38 hurricane, tobacco growers, more on America’s greatest composer, etc. etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awainacht ( talk • contribs) 12:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Y'know, that wording seems... familiar. You're not supposed to cut and paste from books, especially without giving your references. - Denimadept 12:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of History of Connecticut's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "SOTS":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:05, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on History of Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/sub/digbib/loader?did=D6116{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/sub/digbib/loader?did=D6784When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:51, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://chla.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=chla%3Bidno%3D2931364{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://dz-srv1.sub.uni-goettingen.de/sub/digbib/loader?did=D6003When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)