This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Hinkley Point C nuclear power station article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1,
2Auto-archiving period: 90 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Hinkley Point C nuclear power station appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 2 October 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,839 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
How high above sea-level are the reactors? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.55.165 ( talk) 21:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Rather a lot of the early part of the article isn't really about the reactor or the establishment, the power station, or even about its particular situation.
It could be summarised as "various objections did not prevent the project proceeding".
The detailed list of them is not so much encyclopaedic as boring. Midgley ( talk) 00:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Are EDF statements supposed to be included in the article as purely factual, (i.e. "said" or "announced", rather than "claimed"), considering they are not a reliable secondary source but have an obvious direct interest in the project? Especially when it comes to justification for cost increases or delays. — jonas ( talk) 13:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)